Skip to main content

Delawareliberal: Even if we don't look, it's still there

The volume of silence at Delawareliberal over today's dramatic events--jason firing Donviti, Delawaredem quitting in protest; jason and nemski having words--is deafening.

The original deleted post about Donviti leaving, while deleted, can be found here [h/t Mark H.]. I think there was only one more comment made after the cache drop before the post was deleted.

A second post, Nancy Willing alerted me, was also deleted, this being an Unstable Isotope post titled Celia Cohen Unmasks the Hustler who would be Auditor. Nancy put the gist of it in my comments section, and while I have not been able to unearth the cached version of it, you can verify its original existence at Blognet News here.

Pandora, Unstable Isotope, and jason have all been posting throughout the day in what seems like a dogged attempt at normalcy, but after this morning a number of the usual bloggers (liberalgeek, nemski, and cassandra to cite three) have not made much if any appearance.

jason himself has made a few additional cryptic comments and then gone silent.

Macho Comacho has chimed in with unseemly and frankly obnoxious glee [I am linking to MC's comment here; I will not link to his excremental pseudo-blog]; I go with RSmitty's assessment of MC:

Personally, I think Macho is a spineless dick, whether I truly know the person or not.


Even Resolute Determination has taken notice of the incident.

That RD posting, by the way, has drawn a second strange comment from DEConservative(EvanQ) who has now twice made this rather bizarre accusation against donviti:

If you’re a person who, I dunno shows up to throw rocks at someone’s house like a little kid, be man (or woman) enough to take the confrontation you’ve brought on and face the consequences of your actions.


The comment is a milder reprise of one that Evan posted a few days ago at DL:

So why then when I confronted you on the phone after you threw rocks at my window and called my wife and kids names online did you back down and just hang up? I even invited you to visit me anytime you wanted to in order to discuss things but again you hung up. You are nothing but a punk so stop pretending to be Billy Badass. Otherwise back up your talk with some action punk.


This sort of strange talk and unverifiable accusation is exactly, I suspect, why some people prefer to remain anonymous as bloggers. It borders on harassment.

The question I have to ask myself is whether or not this all has anything to do--at least indirectly--with Delawareliberal's series on the Caesar Rodney Institute, as Delawaredem obviously did a couple weeks ago:

For example, Burris used outting to silence Kavips and his opinions of CRI and those involved with it. We will now be increasing our coverage and criticism of CRI. The acceptable response to that criticism and coverage is to deride it if you wish, defend CRI if you want, or to call us name. The unacceptable response is to silence the criticism by outting the pseudonymous critic.


Given the Delaware way, it's frankly possible. And kavips remains silent to this day, despite increasing imprecations from the rest of us to return to the fold.

I will admit that I discounted that potential connection because, quite frankly, I discount a lot of what Delawaredem writes because he spends a great deal of time projecting his own behaviors onto others.

An example, from the same DL post quoted above:

It is an assine justification, and I will tell you why: because all you have to do in response to an insult is to insult me right back. And you right wingers do that all the time. We here at Delaware Liberal are called loons, fascists, Nazis, idiots, baby killers, etc. We are not going to complain about the names you call us, so long as those names are not racist or sexist.


Sounds good, except when you visit some of DD's own rhetoric at the Daily Kos over the past few years, like these gems:

Mariscat is a cunt of the first order.

by Delaware Dem on Thu Feb 01, 2007 at 01:11:56 PM PDT

---

But Mariscat is a bitch, a whore, and a cunt. Whatever derogatory term you want to use, use.

by Delaware Dem on Thu Feb 01, 2007 at 01:31:58 PM PDT


To which a diaryist with the pseudonym Miss Blue responded:

I have posted this offensive commentary in different diaries when the issue of women and violence are being discussed. Crickets. It has never really been addressed, as the poster who made these comments is still posting.

I don’t care what precipitated the comments or who was angry. The fact remains when someone is allowed to post this kind of language, it should affect all women.

Deal with it.


It has become increasingly difficult to take Delawareliberal seriously over the past several months as the threads have often degenerated into little more than serial name-calling (and penis-match challenges). Admittedly, a large part of this level of response has been driven by equally uncivil and tacky rightwing commenters.

There is good content there, substantive coverage of local political issues, and even--at times--world-class snarks.

But more and more lately I find myself clicking on DL not to find out what's happening in State politics, but to indulge the same sort of guilty prurient curiousity that made Jerry Springer a ratings sensation for so long. This has the unfortunate effect of causing me (and, I suspect, others) to discount more thoughtful pieces by Pandora, Cassandra, or UI--and to pine for what almost never appears any more: a substantive Liberalgeek post.

For awhile it seemed as if Delawareliberal was poised to break out of mere blogdom into a more significant status within State politics, with radio-hosting opportunities, charity events, and talk of MSM advertising to drive traffic. The new look seemed calculated to head in that direction. I sincerely hope they get there, because their trailblazing could be beneficial to all the rest of us.

But as a community we can't sit around and pretend that nothing out of the ordinary is happening at Delawareliberal, and since they apparently won't (or aren't ready to) talk about it themselves, somebody will have to keep providing the space to do so.

Comments

Libertarian in Colorado said…
It's like a soap opera... or a Nickelodeon show...

Did someone really show up at someone else's house and throw rocks? That's funny stuff.
LiC
I have no idea whether this happened or not.

But since everybody in Delaware pretty much knows who everybody else is (despite all pretensions to pseudonyms) it is possible.
Someone has suggested that my last comment is an implication that either DV or DD threw rocks at Evans' house. Aside from being sarcastic about anything being possible at 1 am in the morning that's not what I meant to say. I actually presented the quotes to show Evan as being ridiculous.

Sorry if that did not come through.
Anonymous said…
For the record, I am no longer with DelawareLiberal. Some team members and I had significant differences about the blog's direction and I decided that it was probably time for me to move on.

It is a great blog and they are great bloggers and great friends who will continue to have a real impact in Delaware for a long time.

Today there is even less legitimate "4th estate" media in Delaware than when I started commenting on blogs eight years ago. So blogs like this one and DelawareLiberal are more imporant than ever.



-Jason330
On Evan's DIRECT accusation against DV...

I seriously doubt that DV, in spite of his blog rhetoric, would ever do something incredibly stupid as that. Also, keep in mind that these two live in very different parts of NCCo and both have young families. I seriously doubt DV would drive early hours of the morning to seek out and vandalize EQ's house, let alone ANYone's house.

Hopefully EQ was speaking in figurative language and will loudly admit as much and subsequently apologize for the misconception. On the other hand, if he believes it to be factual, then EQ better have some serious and solid proof, because by calling him out directly in that one post, in the absence of proof, he crossed the legal-line of defamation...defamation, in particular, because that spineless dick known as Macho C has made the connections of blog personality to reality.
Mike W. said…
This could all be some meaningless little feud between them that'll just blow over in a few days.

I did get a laugh out of DG's ridiculous penis challenge. I'll never get why anti-gunners have such a fixation on the genitalia of other dudes.
Anonymous said…
I think in good humor the CRI should FOIA them to find out what is going on?
Nancy Willing said…
ATTN PROF: correction please

The Hustler post was authored by El Somwhat'shisface. Not UI. If you read the Dellies you should have known that UI is the least likely to write a stupid post like that.
Nancy Willing said…
Did Jason just say that he has left his blog?
Nancy Willing said…
WOW, these DD quotes from DKos lead one to suspect that his claim that he was the subject of a spectacular outing war there was somewhat deserved.

My feeling, when he arrived at DL, was that he is a power hog-ego head who blanketed the blog with his unseemly essence. [for instance, his ATH became so self-referential he would only link to my posts if they contained a link to his blog. I eventually stopped linking and stopped reading most of what was over there].

DD was also an integral part of the fight against DV stylin' when some political people (READ: Brian Selander DD--BFF?) expressed that they'd participate more with DL if it 'cleaned up its act'. DV published the emails exposing the backroom maneuvering and compromised unethical makings of a secretive bias-for-access. DD was the over-the-top whackhead who promoted the Markell meet-up in such a manner. LOOK AT US! WE GOT ACCESS na na na na na na.

Jason is heads and hands above DD. Bring back Jason.

~~
Kavips will be back I bet. He is regularly in rotation with long silent stints. I just hope that he would give warning before actually closing his blog down. I think his work analyzing the Department of Elections fallacies is an essential piece of the public record of our state.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...