WDEL - Monday September 14th 1-4 pm

1150 AM WDEL's Rick Jensen is taking some well-earned R&R this week.

On Monday I will be filling in as host of The Rick Jensen Show from 1-4 pm.

I have asked my good friend Jason Scott, founder of and former contributor to Delaware Liberal, to join me as special guest co-host.

Our lead topic will be 'Liberalism : Megalomaniacal Pseudo-Ideology or Mental Illness?'

Jason will also be speaking out for the first time about the cyberspace putsch that left him a blogosphere orphan. All will be revealed.

(Of course, I kid.)

Wilmington City Councilman and rising star Steve Martelli will be joining us in the 2pm hour to talk city politics, government and the future of Wilmington.

In the latter part of the show the Fightin' Flahertys, John and Colin, will join us for a freewheeling 4-way crossfire on hot topics, local and national.

Calls are welcome and encouraged : (302) 478-9335 or 1-800-544-1150

It should be a spirited 3 hours.

Comments

downwithabsolutes said…

Oh my...this sounds like it'll be a great show. As I will be occupied at the time, I'm hoping someone can record this and post it to the Intertubes!

September 12, 2009 at 10:12 PM

pandora said…

I can't wait to listen! Maybe I'll even call in. Normally... umm... I don't listen to Jensen. Imagine that!

September 13, 2009 at 9:03 AM

Unknown said…

let me know if you want a guest host to help fill in the time. My own team deosn't allow me on the airwaves...maybe you will :)

September 13, 2009 at 7:56 PM

Brad said…

Great show, Tyler! I listened to part of your show yesterday. The discussion on Wilmington politics was interesting. It sounds like Wilmington government has become even more controlling. Any time police can come on your property and confiscate cars without any warrant, that's a authoritarian government you have there.

September 15, 2009 at 11:49 AM

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here: chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.” The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point: Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo: Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1. Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...

Search This Blog