Skip to main content

Are we actually teaching evolution in Delaware classrooms?

Recently I posted on the fact that, in Biology classes across the nation, evolution is taught as a major staple of science and the scientific method in only 28% of American classrooms.

Given that in Delaware we have a large constituency of folks who are aggressively creationist, and who even managed to push a creationist candidate onto the ballot for US Senate two years ago, it is appropriate to look at what the Delaware Science Standards actually say is supposed to be taught in our schools.

I quote the high-school science standards (#7, which you can download here), focusing on those elements deemed essential in the document:




A. Evolution is a change in allelic frequencies of a population over time.  The theory of evolution is supported by extensive biochemical, structural, embryological, and fossil evidence.
Level:  Essential
B.  The great diversity of organisms is the result of more than 3.5 billion years of evolution that has filled every available niche with life forms.  The millions of different species of plants, animals, and microorganisms that live on Earth today are related by descent with modification from common ancestors.
Level:  Essential
C.  The process of natural selection occurs when some heritable variations that arise from random mutation and recombination give individuals within a species some survival advantages over others. These offspring with advantageous adaptations are more likely to survive and reproduce, thus increasing the proportion of individuals within a population with advantageous characteristics.
Level:  Essential

Pay particular attention of Item B above, which in two sentences covers the salient aspects of our best current scientific understanding of how the world works, including these elements:

--3.5 billion years of evolution (which implies the Earth is 4 billion years old and came into existence as the result of natural processes)

--existing species are the result by descent with modification from common ancestors

This is what is supposed to be taught in Delaware public schools.

No room for creationism or intelligent design, no "teach the controversy" mumbo-jumbo.

The question is, are we teaching it?

It is a critical question because, as Gallup has repeatedly found, only 9% of all Americans with only a high school education believe in evolution as a natural process, and a recent Penn State survey discovered that on 28% of Biology teachers nationwide are seriously teaching evolution to national and state standards.


How do we find out if Biology teachers in Delaware belong to the 28% teaching evolution or the 73% who either do not teach it or do not emphasize it?


I'm not sure, but I offer this thought:  we are currently expending so much energy in Delaware debating school choice, charter schools, RTTT, and all the other political/policy arguments that involve millions of dollars and Federal intervention . . . and we are spending little or no oversight effort on the actual teaching of curriculum in our schools.


That needs to change.





Comments

Dana Garrett said…
You make some good points here, Steve. I think it is vital that we teach evolution in our schools, and people who care about this in Delaware should have a way to check if we are complying with these requirements.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...