Skip to main content

It's always kind of fun to see Delaware Demopublicans claiming that the State doesn't provide them special advantages

Which they do, fairly often.

Just browsing Chapter 33 of the Delaware Code, we find that the words "Democratic" and "Republican" have been declared completely off-limits for all other parties for all time.

No "Democratic Socialist Workers Party" permitted in Delaware.

In fact, Thomas Jefferson's "Democratic-Republican" party would have been illegal here, too.

The Code:
(a) The certificates of nomination shall designate a title for the party which the convention or committee represents, together with any simple figure or device by which its lists of candidates may be designated on the ballot. The figure or title or device selected and designated by the state conventions or committee of any party shall be used by that party throughout this State. Only 1 figure or device shall be used by a party at any election. The same title, figure or device shall not be used by more than 1 party, and the party first certifying a name, title, figure or device to the county departments of elections shall have prior right to use the same, and provided further that the Democratic Party and the Republican Party shall have exclusive use of such title and no other party shall use the word "Democratic" or "Republican" or any variation thereof in its title. Such figure or device may be the figure of a star, an eagle, a plow, or some such appropriate symbol, but the coat of arms or seal of this State or of the United States or the flag of the United States or of this State shall not be used as such figure or device.
Nah, no special privileges.  It's all about the superiority of the message, yah know?

Hypocrites.

Comments

tom said…
Don't forget that members of 3rd parties are excluded from appointment to the county Boards of Elections by § 202 (a) and § 203 (a) of Title 15
July 12, 2012 at 3:38 PM
kavips said…
I'm confused. I see some advantages. Let us say a Republican candidate wanted to run in Wilmington. He could file as a third party, and his party could be called

Democratic.

(the dot at the end is what makes it different.) Considering the mentality of many voters, that could make things difficult especially in the election of an at large seat.

And, considering the smegma attached to both party's names, I'm not sure it would impart the advantage one might wish, such as the Democratic Conservative Party or the Republican Socialists.

I will go out on the limb and say you are arguing a moot point here. :)

Better stick to the Johnsons....
July 12, 2012 at 6:51 PM
tom said…
That is a Straw Man.

Said Republican could already change his party affiliation to Democrat (without the dot), file for the primary and have a far better chance with less effort and expense.

Qualifying a third party for ballot access is a lot of hard work even when it's a legitimate Party as opposed to the obvious subterfuge you propose.
July 12, 2012 at 7:02 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...
44 comments
Read more

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...
22 comments
Read more

Soda tax debate reveals fundamental progressive assertions about your lack of individual rights and the "responsiblities" of the State

I thought it would be at least amusing to use the Delawareliberal comments as sub-headings regarding each category of what is wrong with the proposed tax on sodas and juice drinks. But there are so many different little strands of each comment that it would be impossible to pull them all out. So, instead, I'm going to let you read them in more or less the order they appeared, and note the assumptions. pandora: I’m perfectly okay with taxing sodas and juice drinks. Mainly because they’re total crap, and one of the main reasons our country’s children are overweight. They are also dirt cheap. Assumptions here: (1) Because "I" am perfectly okay with a new tax it should be imposed on everybody; (2) it is the government's responsibility to keep children from being obese; (3) the cheapness of the product to be taxed justifies charging people more for it. John Manifold: Soda fattens your kids [and you and your husband], shortens their lives, costs more than water [a...
31 comments
Read more