Skip to main content

John Carney runs away from his own vote not to Audit the Fed; friends Bernanke

Predictably, US Representative John Carney (D--Special Financial Interests) voted "NO" on the bill to Audit the Federal Reserve yesterday.

Equally predictably (as with his vote to approve indefinite detention in the NDAA), Congressman Carney didn't even have the courage to say why he refused to support governmental transparency and oversight of the national's central bank, which has in effect become and independent fourth branch of the government.

John Carney to his special-interest
contributors:  Don't worry, guys, I'm
holding the line here for you.
Instead, Carney published a love letter to Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke:

"I appreciated the opportunity to ask Chairman Bernanke today about what he believes are the steps Congress must to take in order to encourage economic growth.
“Mr. Bernanke’s testimony today reinforced two important points that must guide the work we do here in Congress as we address the economy and work to create jobs: first, we need to be thoughtful on any cuts we implement in the short-term; and second, the most effective thing Congress can do is quickly pass a comprehensive fiscal plan that includes a long-term tax policy to eliminate uncertainty, which discourages businesses from hiring new workers and investing in new facilities."

Ben Bernanke:  the Fed is like the
Supreme Court, you know, an
independent, non-transparent
arm of Goldmann Sachs, er, I mean,
the government.
Carney's position (if you can dignify his statement with the term) supports Bernanke's own stance that the operations of the Federal Reserve must be completely insulated from all public scrutiny, because any public scrutiny or transparency would represent a "politicizing" of monetary policy.

It's dangerous to let John Carney get involved in major financial decisions, as even our progressive friends at Delawareliberal like cassandra m. understand, writing just two months ago on the Congressman's financial acumen:

I’ve been thinking about this since I saw it this AM and I can’t quite figure out what he is trying to get to here. The choices are:
  1. John Carney thinks  that we really are that stupid.
  2. John Carney actually believes this stuff.

I'm going with option Number One here.

Carney's craven cave-in to Bernanke and his own special-interest backing is one of the primary reasons why Delawareans need to vote in November for Libertarian Scott Gesty, who actually has a position on the Fed and our burgeoning national debt:

America is being consumed by debt. When Congressman Ron Paul introduced House Bill 1207 to audit the Federal Reserve in early 2010, the national debt stood at $11 Trillion. Today, thanks in no small part to the Fed’s “Quantitative easing,” the debt is approaching $17 Trillion—a 55% increase in under three years. We still have not audited the Fed.
Our debt is now greater than America’s entire Gross Domestic Product, the total value of all goods and services produced in this country in a single year. With the Fed printing money, and the current administration spending our grandchildren’s wealth, we are heading into a crisis that will make the 2008 Recession look like a day at the beach. The catastrophe occurring in Greece right now is a warning about where America could be in the next eight years.
We cannot spend or “stimulate” our way back to prosperity. We already know that no miraculous “shovel-ready jobs” are going to put Americans back to work, and we certainly have learned that government money doled out to special interests will not solve our financial problems.
Delaware needs a Congressman who is serious about reducing the size and scope of government. We have to eliminate wasteful bureaucracies like the US Department of Education, while at the same time getting government out of the way of the businesses who can put Americans back to work. Decreasing spending while growing the tax base is the only way to get out of this mess.

Tom Kovach:  Posiions on the issues?
You mean I'm supposed to have them
to run for Congress?  Nobody told me.
I thought you just needed T-shirts.
Oh, and just in case you are wondering, Republican Tom Kovach has NO position on auditing the Federal Reserve, which is possibly the only way you could do worse than John Carney.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...