Skip to main content

John Carney voted to put people out of work in Knoxville TN

John Carney:  so what if a medical
excise tax of prosthetic legs and
hospital beds drives the companies
that produce them out of business?
The story goes this way:

One of the twenty-some taxes in the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) is a Medical Device Excise Tax.  It sounds innocuous until you think about hospital beds, oxygen tanks, EKG monitors, prosthetic limbs, etc, etc, and then you begin to realize this is a MAJOR tax.  It is, in fact, an onerous tax, as the Wall Street Journal reports:

The tax, which applies to sales beginning Jan. 1, 2013, has already taken a toll on some manufacturers.
"Few companies will be able to pass all or even a portion of the tax onto hospitals or distributors, so a number of companies have started to put cost-cutting plans in place," wrote JP Morgan stock analyst Michael Weinstein in a note to investors Thursday. Medtronic inc., the nation's largest device maker, estimates the tax will cost it as much as $150 million in 2013, a spokeswoman said. Stryker Corp. said in a statement Thursday that the $130 to $150 million in will owe next year could consume one-third of of its research and development budget.
Smaller companies will take the worst hits, Mr. Weinstein wrote of the tax, which applies to sales rather than earnings. Small device makers could see earnings per share fall by 10% he estimated.
Medical-supply firm Zimmer Holdings, hospital-bed maker Hill-Rom Holdings and other device makers have also attributed planned layoffs to the tax. Mr. Scott warned that more companies could follow. Because the tax is on total sales, rather than profits, companies with the smallest margins, such as unprofitable start-ups, will face the deepest impact, Mr. Scott said.

There was a piece of bipartisan legislation in the House of Representatives (HR 436) this past January to repeal that tax.

John Carney voted against the repeal of that tax.

And, as we find out from Knoxville TN, the fears of device manufacturers are coming true:

As a follow up to some comments in another discussion, we asked DeRoyal President and COO Bill Pittman to comment on rumors of layoffs related to the medical device excise tax implemented by the health care reform bill. Here's the response we received by way of DeRoyal's VP of HR:
"The medical device tax constitutes the largest cost increase DeRoyal has experienced in its 40-year history. We are working to mitigate this impact in a number of ways from both a revenue and cost perspective. Even in the face of this challenge we are doing everything within our power to preserve US jobs in this incredibly difficult economic environment."
(signature)

Bill Pittman, President & COO
DeRoyal

DeRoyal Industries, based in Powell, is a manufacturer and worldwide distributor of health care equipment and products. DeRoyal has over 2000 employees in 26 states and five countries, with approx. 300 employees locally.

Your votes have consequences, Mr. Carney.

Comments

Unknown said…
It is clear that Carney is not a Delaware representative, but a party and corporate lackey. We have such wonderful alternatives this year with Bernie August and Scott Gesty, why would anyone want to even go back to this stooge?
Unknown said…
I recall Tom Carper stammering all over the place when he was called out on this tax during an interview on CNBC while Obamacare was still being debated. Our current Reps in both houses leave alot to be desired.
christine said…
Everyone will be really affected by the increase in the medical device tax law. Although we do not see it now, we will soon realize it when we use the hospital facilities.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

Soda tax debate reveals fundamental progressive assertions about your lack of individual rights and the "responsiblities" of the State

I thought it would be at least amusing to use the Delawareliberal comments as sub-headings regarding each category of what is wrong with the proposed tax on sodas and juice drinks. But there are so many different little strands of each comment that it would be impossible to pull them all out. So, instead, I'm going to let you read them in more or less the order they appeared, and note the assumptions. pandora: I’m perfectly okay with taxing sodas and juice drinks. Mainly because they’re total crap, and one of the main reasons our country’s children are overweight. They are also dirt cheap. Assumptions here: (1) Because "I" am perfectly okay with a new tax it should be imposed on everybody; (2) it is the government's responsibility to keep children from being obese; (3) the cheapness of the product to be taxed justifies charging people more for it. John Manifold: Soda fattens your kids [and you and your husband], shortens their lives, costs more than water [a...