Skip to main content

Libertarian Party votes highest ever in Delaware

It was a good night for the Libertarian Party of Delaware from several perspectives.

Number one item is that we had the largest Libertarian vote totals statewide in the history of the party.  We had six candidates receive over 3,600 votes, including three over 5,000 votes, and one who nearly reached 8,000.

Our General Assembly candidates collected 5,604 votes across the state.

Our lowest percentage was actually Gary Johnson's record-breaking 0.9% for president.  Every Libertarian candidate who ran for office inside the state collected at least 1% of the vote, and sometimes significantly higher: 6.5%, 7.4%, 7.6%, 8.1%, 10.8%.

Here are the totals and the percentages:

President:  Gary Johnson 3,882 (0.9%)
US House:  Scott Gesty 4,096 (1.1%)
Governor:  Jesse McVay 3,668 (1.0%)
Lt. Gov.:  Margie McKeown 5,206 (1.3%)
Insurance Comm.:  David Eisenhour 7,838 (2.1%)

State Senate 1:  Brian Lintz 555 (3.1%)
State Senate 4:  Marcia DaVinci Groff 410 (1.7%)
State Senate 6:  Wendy Jones 286 (1.2%)
State Senate 7:  James Christina 1,139 (7.6%)
State Senate 12:  Brad Thomas 310 (1.4%)
State Senate 21:  John Potter 187 (1.1%)
State Rep 7:  Bob Wilson 188 (1.8%)
State Rep 11:  Margie McKeown 154 (1.8%)
State Rep 14:  Margaret Melson 925 (10.1%)
State Rep 15:  Amy Merlino 555 (6.5%)
State Rep 16:  John Machurek 277 (3.5%)
State Rep 30:  Gordon Smith 520 (8.1%)
State Rep 35:  Ronnie Fitzgerald 467 (7.4%)
Kent Clerk of the Peace:  Mary Pat McVay 5,313 (10.8%)
5th Levy Court:  Andrew Cronk 247 (2.3%)
Sussex Clerk of the Peace:  David Eisenhour 2,452 (2.8%)
Sussex Council District 2:  Ronnie Fitzgerald 331 (2.5%)

I will do some more breakdown on exactly what this all means later, but here are three important takeaways:

1.  We have reached a fairly solid base of about 5,000 voters who will pull the switch to vote for a Libertarian some of the time if not all of the time.  In a number of these races the Libertarian was the only opposition candidate, so it must be admitted that some of these votes were against the incumbents rather than for the challengers.  That happens everywhere.

2.  On the other hand, it is a fairly safe bet that votes for President, US House, Governor, and Lt. Governor were votes for Libertarians (or, possibly, votes for any third-party candidate).  That means that we have a voter base of about 3,500 voters who are intentionally voting Libertarian when they have the opportunity to do so.  This is small, but it appears to be a fairly firm number, a foundation.

3.  We need to highlight the fact that of the seventeen individuals listed above (here I am not counting Gary Johnson), seven were women (41%).  The stereotype of Libertarians is as being overwhelmingly male.  Our party is not that imbalanced, and we need to highlight that fact, as well as recruit more women as candidates.

If I am correct about the voter base, given that there are fewer than 1,000 registered Libertarians, we have about 2,500 people to find and sign up.  These folks are already voting with us; we need them registered with us.

I do not want to understate the challenge facing the LPD.  Even the worst loser Republicans (is that redundant?) generally got at least 30 times as many votes as we did.

But. . .

The Delaware GOP is tanking.  Tea Partiers are openly discussing secession from their party.  Their candidates are now considered successful if they reach the pinnacle of 40% of the vote and lose semi-competitively in statewide races.  Republican registrations are down, fundraising is down, and we need to start kicking them while they are down . . . unless they want to stop playing the "we are a major party and we will help the Democrats disenfranchise you" game.

3,500 is a small base.  But if we can recruit 10% of that number to be active volunteers, and get half of those folks to commit to modest donations to support our candidates, guess what?

Unlike the Republicans, we have nowhere to go but up.

Comments

Dayl Thomas said…
Simply fantastic and so inspiring! Thanks for the post and the breakdown of what it all means.
Robin said…
Just started the process to change my party affiliation to Libertarian.
Funny-the DE voter registration/change site has Libertarian spelled wrong-what's that tell you?
Bureaucratic inflexibility.

They have an old-style software system that only gives them so many letters, and they built it around enough letters to write Democrat or Republican.

Anybody else gets truncated.

If you are changing parties, Robin, visit the following Facebook pages and be sure to send me a friend request.

Libertarian Party of Delaware
Delaware for Gary Johnson 2016

That's right. 2016.
kavips said…
I would venture that the increase in Libertarian votes is a direct result in the quality of candidates you offered this years.

Perhaps ten or twenty of that increase may have come your way because of the disintegration of local Republicans, but, when given a choice between a thoughtful, compassionate human being and a rabid dog, voters reassuringly went for the human beings.

Keep the quality of these candidates top notch and the party of Libertarians can only grow.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...