Skip to main content

Robo-calls and radio ads against the Libertarian candidate in Missouri

In Missouri, GOPer Todd Akin launched last-minute robo-calls and radio ads against Libertarian US Senate Jonathan Diner, seeking to dissuade Ron Paul supporters from voting Libertarian:
"Jonathan Dine is no conservative," a narrator in the spot says. "He attacks Republicans like Congressman Ron Paul, saying Paul is 'too much of social conservative.'" The spot also includes a testimonial from Rand Paul, who says Akin "will stand with me and vote repeal Obamacare." Akin has deployed robocalls featuring the same statement from Paul.
This is pretty rich:  if Libertarians are so inconsequential, then why would a Republican need to advertise against them?

But my favorite part of the article is on dueling arrest records:
The ad also faults Dine for an criminal record, which includes arrests for marijuana possession and drunk driving. Akin himself, however, was arrested at least eight times in the 1980s at abortion protests. There is no evidence he was ever charged, and supporters calls the arrests examples of civil disobedience, not criminality.  
All of which leads to the greatest line in the whole piece:
Still, [Democrat Claire] McCaskill is the only candidate in the Missouri Senate race without a record of multiple arrests.
Maybe it shouldn't be the "show me" state, but the "book 'em, Dano" state.
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...