Skip to main content

I was never very good at catch-phrases....

Years ago, I served in the military with a guy named Dave who had nn earthly idea how to do his job (which sucks, because his job was evacuating wounded and injured soldiers), but man he could get a name or a phrase to catch on.

It was amazing. He had this sixth sense for what people would be willing to repeat.

I could never do that, and I still can't. But I haven't given up trying. Maybe some day at least one or two people will begin using terms I've coined.

These are my best efforts here, to date:

Demopublican: the dual manifestation of monopolistic political organization in the US.

The Republican Wing of the Demopublican Party: primarily funded by Big Oil, Big Corp, and Big War for the purpose of insuring that everybody around the world hates us enough to keep up demand to purchase new military hardware.

The Democratic Wing of the Demopublican Party: primarily funded by Big Union, Big Entertainment, and Big Soros for teh purpose of insuring that American society is fragmented into as many disparate pieces as possible, all in line looking for a patronage hand-out.

The Sign of Ass and Pachyderm: the coat of arms under which the two of them operate (the Constitution got all tattered and wrinkled, so they had to find something better).

Turd Parties--a new one!-referring to the reluctance of the average American vassal to step into something new that might stick to his/her boots and mark them off as socially ineligible for hand-outs or contracts .

Prottacking: what you do in Delaware politics when you feel like piling on someone outside the mainstream of the patronage system, oblivious to the fact that doing so ruins your own credibility and makes you look just as petty as you think he is.

Rad-baiting: what you're apparently doing any time you disagree with Dana Garrett.

Undercapitalization: a condition in which you either forget about the shift key when you are creating your internet handle (or, alternatively, you mother was scared by a Ken Kesey novel while you were in vitro).

See? It's true. I'm not funny or capable of creating trendy phrases. That's why most of my stuff sounds pretty damn wonkish (and even Tom Noyes thought of that first).

So occasionally, just every once in a while, use one of them and throw me a bone.

Comments

Anonymous said…
When it comes to Dana Garrett, you had it right before alliteration.
These are great ! I think "Prottacking" and "Turd Parties" are the best.

I just don't understand why people on the "inside" seem to despise Protack so. My gut reaction is that he poses a threat to the powers that be, otherwise why bother being so petty?
Anonymous said…
Work on your definitions and you could be funny.

Question: what is your interpretation of piling on?

curious because in context, it seems to be different than mine...
Anonymous said…
Remember O'Toole's Rule:

"It doesn't HAVE to make sense."
Delaware Watch said…
Oh, do let me play by punning on the quite late Sir Isaac Newton.

“Newtonian Histrionics”: The principles explaining the reflexive cheapshots and ad hominem attacks Steve Newton engages in whenever he is acted upon by the immovable gravitas of refutation by superior logic and factual historical citation. A more popularized version of the principles is “The predictable behavior of Steve Newton when he can’t take what he himself dishes out to others.”
Too wordy, Dana.

Try "Newtonian Histrionics": What happens when an unknowing object impacts an immovable intellect and then whines about the bruises."

Wherein, of course, you are free to make me the object and you the intellect if, on alternate Thursdays, I get to bash Huckabee all by myself.

I mean, if you're going to do me, put some real thought into it. I thought "RAD-baiting" at least had merit as a pun.
Delaware Watch said…
LOL! You are correct. Mine is too wordy and yours is much better.

I tip my hat to you. You are better at this than me. :)

Have you ever read the Devil's Dictionary? I read it years ago and though it was quite funny.
I read the Devil's Dictionary and liked it, but actually preferred the Pervert's Dictionary that was published in Penthouse back in the early 1980s. From memory:

Pervert: what you secretly suspect you are.

Perversion; what you have always secretly wanted to try.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...