Skip to main content

Why we need to dump the Demopublicans in Delaware?

My top ten reasons (at first they were going to count down in order, but then I kept not being able to prioritize them):

10. Everyone is always surprised when Delaware Psychiatric, Delaware Corrections, of DFS has another scandal; you have to wonder why, since there was no oversight built into these systems.

9. We have such a fully functional nepotism system that not only can your otherwise unemployable children get state jobs if you are an elected official, but you can get the entire Democratic Party membership to vote for Beau Biden as Attorney General.

8. Our environmental protection from our elected officials is so good that New Castle Country air quality is among the worst in the nation, bad water kills off thousands of fish on a regular basis, and the second smallest state in the country has 14 EPE superfund cleanup sites active.

7. Our Freedom of Information Act allows organizations like DSU to hide the salaries of legislators who work for them and openly lobby for them to get more money.

6. We have representatives attempting to hide anti-abortion language in the anti-cloning bill, and a bipartisan team of senators proposing a constitutional amendment that will not only prohibit gay marriage and civil unions, but also effectively nullifies part of the US Constitution.

5. We have the city of Wilmington declaring eminent domain over private businesses for economic development purposes.

4. We have a business/education lobby that is trying to help itself to $100 million in public funds for so-called "education reform" that is not selling well with the public, so they use their own house organ policy research institute to pimp for it and the News Journal prints that as legitimate news. (We won't talk about how many school districts are in financial trouble.)

3. We actually have elected officials trying to get John Atkins back into the General Assembly.

2. Many of our legislators are actually sitting back and quietly conspiring to help Delmarva Power kill wind power.

1. We're actually contemplating giving Orlando George and Del Tech their own tax to go along with all the free SEEDS tuition at the expense of competing colleges and universities in the area.

We don't have representative government in this state.

We have two superficially different insider groups dedicated to sharing the spoils.

Comments

I like #3 and #9. Gave me a (sad) smile in a somewhat tedious day.

What to do? I have followed the discussion in previous posts closely.

What to do? The nature of any political organization, or organizations in general for that matter seem to lead to strife, disagreement, and eventual ineffectiveness (I am thinking of Common Cause as an example). Can you address how the inevitable clash of egoes and general crankiness can be managed?
Anonymous said…
"two superficially different insider groups dedicated to sharing the spoils."

Can I use that? Nice.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

Soda tax debate reveals fundamental progressive assertions about your lack of individual rights and the "responsiblities" of the State

I thought it would be at least amusing to use the Delawareliberal comments as sub-headings regarding each category of what is wrong with the proposed tax on sodas and juice drinks. But there are so many different little strands of each comment that it would be impossible to pull them all out. So, instead, I'm going to let you read them in more or less the order they appeared, and note the assumptions. pandora: I’m perfectly okay with taxing sodas and juice drinks. Mainly because they’re total crap, and one of the main reasons our country’s children are overweight. They are also dirt cheap. Assumptions here: (1) Because "I" am perfectly okay with a new tax it should be imposed on everybody; (2) it is the government's responsibility to keep children from being obese; (3) the cheapness of the product to be taxed justifies charging people more for it. John Manifold: Soda fattens your kids [and you and your husband], shortens their lives, costs more than water [a...