Skip to main content

Does John McCain read Delaware Libertarian?

Probably not, since I said I'd never vote for him based on his refusal to reject preemptive war.

On the other hand, McCain's new health care initiative features a tax credit idea he must have stolen from me:

While still having the option of employer-based coverage, every family will also have the option of receiving a direct refundable tax credit - effectively cash - of $2,500 for individuals and $5,000 for families to offset the cost of insurance. Families will be able to choose the insurance provider that suits them best and the money would be sent directly to the insurance provider. Those obtaining innovative insurance that costs less than the credit can deposit the remainder in expanded Health Savings Accounts.


Here's part of what I proposed back on January 6 (too bad he didn't read all of it):

1. Make all premium payments and out-of-pocket medical expenses 100% tax deductible for everyone not otherwise covered below. (Somebody explain to me, please, why this isn't already the case if we're so worried about people's health care being financially ruinous.)

2. For all individuals/families under 400% of the Federal Poverty Level who are not covered by Medicaid and/or SCHIP, provide a $5000/person tax exemption for medical expenses OR a 100% tax credit for premium payments and out-of-pocket medical expenses to those who itemize their taxes. Phase this exemption/credit out in graduated steps between $80,000-180,000 annual income, with such families then falling under item 1.

A. In the event that an individual/family does not possess a tax liability that reaches $5000/person, provide the employer with a tax credit for up to that amount of Federal payroll taxes and require that this amount then be paid to the employee in the form of a "tax-free health care payroll tax rebate."

3. Allow each individual a one-time "catastrophic" health care tax credit of an additional $10,000/year for a five-year period; should the individual (or guardian) not be making sufficient income to receive the full benefit of this credit, issue a rebate through the employer of ALL Federally mandated payroll deductions until the $50,000 ceiling has been reached. There should also be a provision that allows such an individual/family to file to have all Federal withholding stopped immediately until the ceiling has been reached.

4. Allow Federal Emergency Medical Loans against the catastrophic benefit listed in item 3, with the benefit serving as security.


I'm still not voting for him.

Comments

Tyler Nixon said…
Would that McCain would steal more of your ideas, Steve.

The test of ego versus intellect is whether you can put your best proposals and thoughts out there with the wholehearted sentiment : STEAL THIS IDEA.

Whatever anyone's qualms about Ron Paul, before he made his stand on the national scene no one and I mean no one ever, in the prevailing/mainstream media or in the political dialogue, spoke of the engineered (intended or otherwise) devaluation of the dollar.

Now it is on the lips of a myriad who before only ever spoke of interest rates, inflation, the CPI, etc etc etc. They won't utter his name but his ideas have had a deep impact and still are, acknowledged or not.

One of the best indictments of collectivism on many levels is found in Richard Weaver's Ideas Have Consequences.

Ahh, the "Great Stereopticon"...

Indeed, ideas have consequences for better or worse.

Keep 'em coming.
Anonymous said…
If John McCain reads this blog at all it is only through a surrogate becuase I doubt his little T-rex arms can reach the keyboard-

from the recovery bed and before the new round of drugs arrive or sober but still out of it and feeling it acutely, Brian

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...