Eminent Domain Rights Hearing Tomorrow

Tomorrow, Wed May 7th, the Delaware State Senate Small Business Committee is holding a public hearing on SB 245, an excellent piece of legislation to curb eminent domain abuses by municipalities (ahem, City of Wilmington) using it as a truncheon for private developers.

South Market Street area auto shop owner Ed Osborne has been waging a one-man crusade against the heavy-handed steamroller tactics of the Wilmington city government. The city government appears intent to drive businesses like his somewhere else (or just out of business completely) to make way for the Buccini-Pollin condos and assorted housing projects the city government's denizens want so badly.

Osborne fought the government, eventually the City Council*, and finally took his cause to the State General Assembly, with the assistance of State Rep. Dennis Williams. Fortunately, his pleas have been heard and a bi-partisan, bicameral bill has been fashioned in SB 245, closing any statutory loophole language and clamping down on eminent domain by limiting it to truly "public use".

[* - To his great credit, 1st District Councilman Charles Potter, Jr. opposed the city government's scheme and was the sole dissenting vote on council.]

Ed writes :

Delaware property rights have been challenged as you know, and now is the time to stand and protect them I need as many people in Dover as possible on

Wednesday may 7th at 1:30 pm. , in Legislative Hall

This has been a long and hard battle for my family and me but it has been worth it. Because I know in my heart that when the fight is no longer worth it my belief in myself and the American dream will cease to exist.

Thank

Ed Osborne
Here is the notice of the meeting :

SENATE Committee Meeting Notice

Committee: Small Business
Chairman: Venables
Room: Senate Majority Caucus Room
Date/Time: 5/7/2008 1:30 PM

Agenda

SB 245 AN ACT TO AMEND TITLES 10 AND 29 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND EMINENT DOMAIN. Sponsor : Venables

If you can, please attend and make your voices known for property rights over government abuse in Delaware. Even if you can't attend, contact your legislators to let them know you support passage of SB 245.

The bill has major sponsorship (enough co-sponsors in the House to guarantee passage). It is a giant step forward for protecting individual freedom in Delaware, unlike any legislation I have ever seen.

Major kudos to all of its sponsors and co-sponsors for acting quickly and decisively on the side of citizens against abuse of power and resources by local governments. In the case of Wilmington, this has involved politicians who have shamelessly been taking political contributions from the very developers (Buccini family) for whom they have been pimping this eminent domain threat scheme in the South Walnut Street area.

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here: chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.” The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point: Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo: Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1. Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...

Search This Blog