Skip to main content

In honor of Iron Man, the Movie (and Hube)





The remnants of my original 600+ comix collection of Silver-Age Marvels exist safely under glass, framed on the wall of the home office. I picked these to hang on to as representative of the joy of the early 1960s Marvels, when Stan Lee, Jack Kirby, Steve Ditko, Don Heck, and Dick Ayers were revolutionizing the comix industry.

Lee and Kirby, obviously, are legitimate icons of the whole business. Ditko was something of a cult figure, an acquired taste, and a master of almost baroque mood (I tend to think about him, somehow, in the same category with Gil Kane, except that Kane never quite had Ditko's class). Heck and Ayers were second-stringers--journeymen artists who did most of the heavy lifting on the back-up heroes like Giant Man and Iron Man. (Ayers' true love and place to shine was obviously NIck Fury and the Howlin' Commandoes; Heck did a number of early Avengers--after Kirby left and prior to issue 40--that deserve more attention than they usually get.) Ayers and Heck more or less disappeared into the mists after the arrival of the next wave of artists like Gene Colan (aka Adam Austin), John Buscema, Johnny Romita, and (even) Werner Roth.

The four issues under glass are Avengers #4, Tales of Suspense #59, Tales to Astonish #60, and Spiderman #34.

A little about each:

Avengers #4 is justly famous for bringing back Captain America from that block of ice. The Avengers were something of a Justice League rip-off (with most of the assembled heroes having their own strips), with Stan Lee's typical treatment that, in the early days, the group didn't really get along. But what did you expect with the Incredible Hulk as a charter member? The Hulk didn't last long, and with the arrival of Captain America the focus changed and the internal bickering pretty much disappeared. There were some really good issues (I loved Kang the Conqueror in issue #6), but I don't think the Avengers actually came into their own until Thor, Giant Man (and the Wasp), and Iron Man disappeared for awhile. Then Cap got Quicksilver (a poor man's mutant Flash), the Scarlet Witch (his sister), and Hawkeye (villain turned anti-hero from the Iron Man series); they had a particularly good two-parter against the Swordsman in about issues 20-21--a strong story with workmanlike art by Don Heck,

Tales of Suspense #59 and Tales to Astonish #60 attempted to put four second-stringers into their own books. Iron Man and Captain America split Suspense, while Giant Man and the Hulk divided up Astonish (later, the Sub-Mariner would push out Giant Man for the second slot). (The Hulk had lost his own, stand-alone book after six groundbreaking but poor selling issues.) I never really felt like either Captain America or Giant Man found themselves in this format. Iron Man, once Gene Colan took over the pencils, became an excellent, consistent feature, although the continued stories got stretched unmercifully (especially the final confrontation with Whiplash in the last few issues of the magazine).

The Hulk was something else. Steve Ditko continued with the pencils he had taken over from Jack Kirby, and did his best work on a series of stories that found Bruce Banner and his alter ego trapped in Communist China. Later Marie Severin took over the artwork and moved the Hulk back into the big time (with some help from the latter rugged pencils of Herb Trimpe).

But I always felt that one of the best renditions of the Hulk was provided in the two or three stories done by Micky Dimeo (somewhere around issues #85-88), a long-time Marvel inker who did very little artwork on his own. Dimeo's Hulk owed something to Bill Everett, but had a harsh, slab-like appearance that I always felt captured the beast better than anybody else did until Trimpe (or perhaps the Jim Steranko cover from Hulk Annual #1).

I'd love to find a image of the Dimeo Hulk on the web, but haven't been able to do so yet. If anybody can provide one, I'd be greatful.

Spiderman #34 is late Ditko (his last issue would be #39), and there is nothing particularly stellar about the story. In fact, after the issues in the mid-20s, the story-telling went downhill until Romita came along with #40. But what a killer cover!

I learned to read, and even arguably learned to write reading these comix. Fortunately, I had parents who believed that it didn't matter what a kid was reading just as long as he was reading.

Comments

Hube said…
Awesome stuff, Steve! Unfortunately, most of my desirable Silver Age collection has been auctioned off on eBay -- as I wanted a complete Iron Man collection. (The proceeds went to completing such.)

Hold onto that Avengers #4, man. That's priceless.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...