Skip to main content

BREAKING! Lobbying dries up and disappears in the new administration

NOT.

From the DC Examiner:

Early numbers suggest that the first quarter of 2009 has seen lobbying in the nation’s capital spike by nearly 22 percent over last year, which would be the largest ever increase in lobbying activity — and a strong indication that President Barack Obama has helped usher in a Golden Era for K Street.

Between Jan. 1 and March 16 this year, the Senate Office of Public Records received 1,381 new lobbying registrations, which include new lobbying firms, new clients at existing firms, and businesses hiring their first lobbyists. This is the largest batch of new registrations since 1999, the first year these records were kept, and a 21.7 percent increase over last year.

If you subtract the lobbying accounts that have been terminated, you get a net gain in active lobbying accounts this year of 1,252, which represents a surge of 13.5 percent over last year’s growth of 1,103 net lobbying accounts in the same period.
The number of active lobbying accounts is not the only measure of lobbying activity — dollars spent is probably the most important number, but first-quarter figures on that won’t be available until late April. The first quarter, of course, has two weeks remaining, and 76 days is a small sample size, but the bump in new registrations is significant enough to support anecdotal evidence that Obama’s ambitious agenda and breakneck pace are a major boon to the very industry he ran against.

The $787 billion stimulus bill, which was the largest spending bill in U.S. history, and the $410 billion fiscal year 2009 omnibus spending bill, which was larded with 8,750 earmarks, attracted thousands of lobbyists in search of pet programs and earmarks. This column reported on dozens of town, city, county and state governments or government agencies hiring new lobbyists this winter — an effort to grab a share of the trillion dollars in spending on the table.

Obama doesn’t deserve full responsibility, however. From 1999 to 2007, federal lobbying spending grew by an average rate of 8 percent a year. From 2007 to 2008, the amount of lobbying accelerated, with spending growing by a record 14 percent, even with the recession and the election putting a damper on fourth-quarter lobbying activity. If lobbying spending grew by 14 percent last year with flat growth in net new accounts in the spring, what will this spring’s boom in new accounts yield?
Reading through the new registrations, three growth sectors seem to be driving the lobbying boom: municipalities, alternative energy and Democratic firms picking up corporate clients.

Towns, cities, counties and states (some as small as Cordova, Alaska, population 2,251) bought into K Street this year, mostly seeking stimulus funding. Will these local governments terminate their lobbyists this year, or — as often occurs — will they continue seeking favors now that they’ve got a taste of Washington largess? If the latter occurs, the Obama lobbying boom will be of unprecedented magnitude.


But, of course, all the lobbyists inside the administration will keep that from happening, right?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...