Skip to main content

Prominent Michigan Libertarian provides alternatives to gigantic government spending to address economy

I particularly like this piece from the Port Huron (MI) Times Herald by City Councilman and local Libertarian chair Mark Byrne not so much because I agree with every jot and tittle, but because he demonstrates that there are different strategies available to deal with the Great Meltdown.

Moreover, he also demonstrates that many Libertarians are thinking analytically about economic issues and realistic questions of taxation, rather than being slavishly limited in their viewpoints by ideological blinders:

Libertarians predicted the housing bubble bursting and the mortgage crisis. We advocated preventing this by these proposals:


Stop letting Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac make more loans to less-credit-worthy customers each year.


Stop artificially making money cheap to borrow with low federal rates that encouraged borrowing for risky investments.

A 21st-century tax system is needed now. We must switch from income, payroll and property taxes paid by the products produced here to a tax that taxes all products made anywhere the same. This immediately makes our products less costly and foreign products more expensive, a reverse of our current tax system.

Whatever size government we choose, the tax system should not work against us. Our current taxes add 40% to the cost of products and only 6% to foreign products in Michigan. We need a system that taxes both imported and domestically produced products the same, so we don't put our products at a disadvantage.

A 30% sales tax with no other taxes would decrease the cost of producing a product by 40%. A car costing $16,000 to make would cost only $9,600 when sold here at $12,480. Foreign cars now selling for $10,000 would sell for $13,000. Overnight, we are competitive again.

To jump-start the economy from this mess, the $2 trillion in bailouts and stimulus packages could have been used to keep funding the government during a three-month tax vacation.

This would allow a transition from our current tax system that taxes the production of goods to a 21st-century tax system that taxes the consumption of goods with a sale tax. People would start getting their entire pay checks and want to spend them before the 30% sales tax kicks in.


That last paragraph really represents the kind of innovative thinking that is, unfortunately, conspicuous by its absence in much of the current economic debate on the part of either the administration's supporters or detractors.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Steve,
I realize you said you don't agree with everything he said, but if you agree with the priciple he is putting forth then basically you advocate the Fair Tax. Just saying, to the best of my poor Southern Delaware minds way of thinking. Yours Truly,

Marsh Fox

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...