Skip to main content

"Race to Witch Mountain" sports surprisingly Libertarian themes

This weekend at the beach I took the kids to see Race to Witch Mountain remake, and I was prepared for the usual fairly plotless, inane Disney release.

Well, it is pretty inane and in many ways clueless, what with the cut-rate Terminator sub-plot and all....

But the movie also has a surprisingly Libertarian slant.

The bad guys--both human and alien--are the government. Both governments are determined to achieve their policy ends even it requires killing children, using massive firepower indiscriminately, and wrecking vast amounts of private property without the slightest hesitation. The one guy from the government who occasionally shows twinges of conscience from time to time never reaches the point of protesting: the idea that he should shut up and soldier to save his job always gets him back into line.

But the really interesting scene takes places in a small southwestern restaurant/bar where the sheriff (Ike Eisenmann from the original film in a cameo) briefly stands up to the Feds. The Feds pull their guns to intimidate the locals, and the locals--law enforcement and civilians alike--draw down on them without the slightest hesitation. The director doesn't overplay it, but along with the deputies backing up their sheriff you can clearly see, for example, one long-haired restaurant patron holding a shotgun on the Feds. (As a plausibility issue, you do kinda wonder where he got it. Was he eating with it under the table? But if you've got plausibility issues, what are you doing at a Disney movie?)

Curiously enough, promotional information for the film suggests that the director actually sought technical advice from the CIA and the military:

Director Fickman ... added that, as fantastical as the film is, he strove for a sense of reality, and sought out UFO experts and military and CIA advisers for assistance.


You have to wonder if they had any idea how they were going to be presented.

I suspect, since work on the movie started in 2007, that an earlier release date was intended, and that the film was meant to be an anti-Bush administration film, given all the subliminal messages about excess government authority and abuse of power.

But to have it appear now is a truly interesting twist.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...