Skip to main content

My grandson...

... already wants a do-over on the year 2009.

And at least one of the reasons should make you sit up and take notice if you have a child below the age of six.

On January 4, he and my son were horsing around (reading wrestling, struggling, fighting, shooting at each other, whatever) in the basement area of the house set aside for childhood mayhem.

Shane jumped from a couch cushion eighteen inches high onto a heavily carpeted floor ... and broke his leg.

Six weeks in a full leg cast.

The day he got the cast off, we also scheduled him for a routine visit to the eye doctor. One reason: why not bunch as many appointments on the same day as possible. Second reason: his mom had only recently gotten a full-time job with healthcare benefits. Third reason: we'd recently gotten one of those routine notes from the school nurse that his vision check suggested he might need a follow-up.

If you have kids in school you get those notes on a fairly regular basis.

So he's got the cast off for all of forty-five minutes and the eye doctor tells his mom: His left eye is not focusing at all. He's going to have to wear and eye-patch over the right eye for the next five weeks, and special glasses for the next several years to avoid going blind in that eye by the time he's nine.

Not a great day at the household. Fortunately, little kids are resilient, and now the patch and glasses have become part of the normal routine. His vision seems to be improving, but what the hell do I know?

Two lessons I learned from this:

1) Little kids don't know that they don't see well because they have no reason to think whatever they see is not normal. And the smart little kids--according to our eye doctor--often cheat on vision tests because they think it's a game. So if they can't read the chart from a distance, they will actually sneak up and memorize it before their test. Sometimes they even get other kids to tell them the answers.

2) People are boors. It's amazing the number of unfriendly (and, yes, I mean that word) stares and intrusive, obnoxious questions you get from people if you are with a child wearing an eye patch. Did he put his eye out? Can I see under the patch? Is he going blind? I've even experienced people picking up their kids and shuffling them away, because apparently an eye patch and glasses are indications of virulently contagious junior leprosy.

So if you've got little kids, think strongly about that vision check-up.

And if you see me out with my grandson, act like you've got some class.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Oh man, if one of my kids has to go the eye-patch route, it's gonna be a Pirate Party until he or she tells me I am boring the hell out of him/her. There's an opportunity in just about anything.
Anonymous said…
Steve, my son, at the same age, had the same problem. I am happy to report that by the age of nine the glasses were gone and his vision was corrected.

Good luck!
Anonymous said…
Manoman, Steve. Best of luck, mi amigo.

Cripes, I feel quite blessed that our daughter, now almost 15, hasn't suffered through anything worse than the flu!
My reaction to a kid and eye patch would probably be "Coooooool" ! Probably not the best response either.

Good luck with this. Kids are pretty resilient, much more than us old folk.
Anonymous said…
Steve, just keep his spirits up. We dealth with similar issues and my son is doing great.
David said…
You all need to move downstate. We don't shuffle our children away from kids with an eye patch or wheelchair or whatever else.

My he have a speedy recovery
Delaware Watch said…
I wish your grandson a speedy & complete recovery.
Bowly said…
My little brother went through the eyepatch thing when we were kids. Watch him, he will peek when he thinks he can get away with it. But lil bro has long since been OK, and here's hoping your young'un has the same luck.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

Soda tax debate reveals fundamental progressive assertions about your lack of individual rights and the "responsiblities" of the State

I thought it would be at least amusing to use the Delawareliberal comments as sub-headings regarding each category of what is wrong with the proposed tax on sodas and juice drinks. But there are so many different little strands of each comment that it would be impossible to pull them all out. So, instead, I'm going to let you read them in more or less the order they appeared, and note the assumptions. pandora: I’m perfectly okay with taxing sodas and juice drinks. Mainly because they’re total crap, and one of the main reasons our country’s children are overweight. They are also dirt cheap. Assumptions here: (1) Because "I" am perfectly okay with a new tax it should be imposed on everybody; (2) it is the government's responsibility to keep children from being obese; (3) the cheapness of the product to be taxed justifies charging people more for it. John Manifold: Soda fattens your kids [and you and your husband], shortens their lives, costs more than water [a...