Skip to main content

President of European Union fears loss of freedom; calls for libertarian solutions

Even in Europe, not everyone believes the rush toward more statism is a good thing.

From the Times:

THE leader of the Czech Republic, which holds the rotating European Union presidency, has warned that a “Europe of states” is in danger of turning into a “state of Europe”, legislating on almost every aspect of people’s lives but lacking in democracy and transparency.

In an interview with The Sunday Times, President Vaclav Klaus drew parallels between Brussels and the failed communist dictatorships of eastern Europe.

“My criticism is based on the sensitivity towards attempts to restrain freedom and democracy, and it does relate to the fact that for most of my life I lived in a political, social and economic system which was not free and was not democratic,” he said.

Klaus also predicted that Gordon Brown’s attempts to produce a European solution to the global economic crisis in time for next month’s G20 summit in London could make the problems worse.

Klaus, 67, an economist by training and a successful finance minister after the fall of communism, said he believed Brown’s plans for more regulatory supervision of the financial system would resolve nothing. Instead, Europe should let business and markets go free.

“The crisis cannot be solved by restraining human initiative and putting further burdens on businesses,” he said. “I propose the exact opposite: deregulation, liberalisation, removing barriers and unnecessary obstructive legislation at the European level.”


Oh shit footnote: I was going to run Vaclav Klaus' photo with this post. Fortunately, at the last second, I realized that the photo situated in the logical place on the Times page for Klaus' image to be was that Austrian who just got convicted of rape, incest, and murder. Never import pictures when you're really tired.

Comments

Anonymous said…
The "Libertarian solution" is exactly what got us into this economic mess to begin with. There has to be government oversight and regulation to keep runaway greed from wrecking our nation! I am surprised, Steve, that that message has not penetrated.

Perry Hood
Anonymous said…
Steve: Just don't ask Perry exactly how that happened. He'll be flummoxed, write some gibberish, and then when called on it will say "we are twisting his words" or that "we fail to understand him" ....
Anonymous said…
Hube, you insult Steve, who we all know well is more capable than most in speaking for himself and for defending his point of view.

Perry Hood
Anonymous said…
LOL, Perry. Steve actually has a sense of humor, unlike some people around here. Nevertheless, he's as cognizant of your M.O. as everyone else.
Perry,
If you go back and search the Let's Be Like Europe tag, you will find that Klaus is also referring to the creation of a massive "surveillance state" and violations of civil liberties.

Government regulation and oversight is a wonderful platitude, and I am not against transparency and regulation, but do you actually have any real information about what's happening today in Europe, or are you just--as usual--arguing general talking points without specific evidence?
Anonymous said…
I don't understand Mr. Klaus' hate towards EU. All of the ideas he proposes are that EU should just be broken up and forgotten. And yet here he is talking about deregulation and removing barriers. I don't understand that man sometimes.

Take care, Elli

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...