Skip to main content

Altria Group downgraded to sell, sell, sell for lack of soul. . . .


Regular readers will recall that I recently posted An Open Letter to Mr. Michael E. Szymanczyk, Chairman & CEO, The Altria Group, regarding the return of the $708,000 of our tax money that Governor Ruth Ann Minner gave away to Kraft General Foods within a week of announcing that every public school district in the state would have to cough up $8-10 million in budget cuts.

I sent the letter directly to Mr Szymanczyk (no answer yet) and also to the Contributions & Communities section of the Altria Group.

They, at least, have answered. Sort of.

Here is the text of the response:

Thank you for requesting support from Altria Group, Inc. for Children of Kraft General Foods.

Altria Group's contributions program focuses on supporting organizations in the areas of hunger relief, domestic violence prevention, and the arts. All of our grant making is conducted through an invitation only application process. Only organizations with which we have a funding history are eligible to apply. We do not accept unsolicited proposals. If you would like to learn more about our philanthropic program, please visit our Web site at www.altria.com.

We wish you all the best in your fundraising efforts.

To learn more about our contributions program, please visit our Web site at: www.altria.com/contributions.

Thank you for contacting the Altria family of companies.

Corporate Communications

Altria Client Services


First note that this is not an automated reply. Somebody actually had to read my letter in order to pull out the chunk "for the Children of Kraft General Foods."

Now let's see what Altria's position is: you can only receive charitable funds from us if we invite you to apply. We only invite those to apply that we have previously funded.

OK--let's be honest. I didn't expect Altria to return the money; I didn't even really expect to receive a reply.

But what I do expect is that Jack Markell, John Carney, or (God help me) Mike Protack take a stand against corporate welfare, especially at a time when Delaware apparently cannot even pay for its schools.

Of course, as Intercourse says on Down with Absolutes:

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and has feathers, its a well-funded sleazy politician who’s bought and paid for and screw the rest of you if it waddles to a win in November.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...