Skip to main content

Guest Post: Indian Independence- in America

"May [the Declaration] be to the world, what I believe it will be ... the signal of arousing men to burst the chains under which monkish ignorance and superstition had persuaded them to bind themselves, and to assume the blessings and security of self-government." Thomas Jefferson's last letter written to Roger C. Weightman, June 24, 1826

In the chronicles of India's long march to independence people naturally tend to think of Mahatma Gandhi whose provocative use of non-violence brought the British Empire to its knees. But there were many groups advocating for Indian independence for a long time, many of them were inspired by the ideals of the American Declaration of Independence, as Gandhi himself was, until on January 26, 1930 Indians declared their independence to the world, led by a movement to end taxation on salt culminating on the march to Dandi.

Our guest post today is an article by Mr.B. S. Prakash the Consul General of India in San Francisco and a writer for the Indian Webzine Rediff that you can click on at his link to get an interesting view of American life and culture from an Indian perspective, and he gives us an interesting view of how an Indian's were inspired to Independence from the British Empire.

The War of India's Independence -- in America
March 06, 2008

Eight years before Mahatma Gandhi's [Images] first call for civil disobedience against the British, why, a year even before his return from South Africa to India, a cry for India's freedom was heard from the distant shores of the Pacific Ocean. This struggle which came to be known as the Gadar movement, the Hindustani word for rebellion, is certainly recorded in Indian history, but not as well known among us as it deserves to be.

I should start with an honest acknowledgment of my own ignorance. Posted to San Francisco from Delhi, I had wondered as to why the Indian government, soon after our Independence had set up an office in this city to cover the western part of the United States. After all, in the fifties there was no Silicon Valley, no technology tie ups, no Indian whiz kids buzzing around, all of which was to come only in the eighties. Why San Francisco then and not Los Angeles, a bigger city with a larger Indian community?

In response to my curiosity and queries, I had been told that in the minds of our leaders of yesteryears, the western part of the US had readily evoked images of San Francisco and the Gadar movement which had its origins there. Having arrived in San Francisco, the next step for me was to explore this historical connection and to look at the photos and the archival material, preserved in the Gadar memorial, a monument to the movement. I believe what I learnt is worth sharing, especially in this sixtieth anniversary year of the Independence.

We cast our eyes back to the first decade of the last century, say the year 1908. This was a time when Indians were very much a part of the British army. Some of them, as a token of appreciation to their loyal service, were sent on a visit to England [Images] and then on to Canada [Images], a part of the British Empire. A few, mainly from Punjab, found their way to California from Vancouver in Canada. It would appear that they were inspired by the American ideals of freedom and openness as also the recognition for hard work and entrepreneurship. Besides land was plentiful, and then as it is to this day, those from Punjabi peasant stock were excited with the prospects of farming.

Indians were not readily accepted, could not own land, but nevertheless the first migration to North America, in terms of a few thousands Sikh farmers occurred at that period. After a few years, there was a stirring in the mind: 'If Americans are so free, why are we not? Why are we lorded over by the British?'

Every such inchoate aspiration needs a catalyst to take shape. The figure of Lala Hardayal appears in the narratives of the Gadar movement as the person who organised the early rebels. Born in 1884, Hardayal had studied at St Stephens' College in Delhi and later at Oxford. By 1912, he was a professor at Stanford University, having spent some time at Berkeley as well. Reading about him, after all these years, one cannot but be struck by his academic credentials: St Stephens, Oxford, Berkeley and Stanford -- all stellar names for a sound career, even today. Names that one flaunts for a plum position in the establishment.

How much more in British India, then?

But Hardayal's dreams and desires were different: 'Our object is not to reform the government, but to reform it away, leaving, if necessary, only nominal traces of its existence,' he wrote in his letters. [note: This exceprt puts Hardayal solidly in the anarcho-minarchist camp of politcal philosophy, and outside of typical libertarianism, but interesting to note becuase he falls directly into that school of thought. And while Hardayal's movement did not end well, Gandhi's peaceful libertarian movement ended in Independence. Interesting thought.]

How do we know all this? We get a peep into the mind and methods of Hardayal through a curious source: a police diary written by the British case officers Slattery and Isemongers, tracing the evolution and eventual destruction of 'the Gadar conspiracy,' as the case came to be known.

First printed by the Punjab police in 1917, it was fortunately reprinted last year with a useful introduction by Dr Ved Prakash Vatuk. Being meticulous in their CID work, the diary gives us the life and work of Hardayal, the 'anarchist and trouble maker' as seen by the British.

A quotation from the diary will give a flavour of the British view about him:
'Such agitations and conspiracies as have come to notice hitherto among Indians have been furtive and insidious, seeking to undermine gradually the loyalty among people. Hardayal, even in his younger days, had set himself to bring an early revolution in India. His plan -- as shown by his career in the United States -- was to force the pace from the start. He told his hearers and readers that an armed rebellion was necessary; that it was coming soon.'

By 1913, some of the individuals suffused with the ideas of independence and freedom had come together. They met at a place which they named Yugantar Ashram. Inspired by the ideals of the first war of Indian independence of 1857, they started publishing a magazine under the banner of Gadar -- rebellion. This was a highly idealistic and motivated group; among the important personalities were names such as Baba Sohan Singh Bhakna, Kartar Singh Saraba, Rama Chandra, Vishnu Govind Pingle.

A look at the names and photos still seen at the Gadar memorial today reveal that this was a group transcending class, caste and religious divides.

The 'seditious' call of the Gadarites was problematic for the British but just as the movement was gathering some momentum, the First World War broke out causing a change in the course of events. The Gadar members thought that the moment was ripe to return from West to India to fight the British, and they were encouraged in this by the Germans.

However, the climate in India was not conducive to rebellion or anarchistic attitudes and the national leadership of the time was inclined to collaborate with the Raj. Besides, the US, a close ally of England started rounding up the rebels and back in India they found that the police intelligence was able to thwart their plans.

A combination of factors thus led to the dissipation and collapse of the movement by 1917 with the key figures arrested or hung or 'ceasing to be a menace' as the police diary describes it.

India's course for Independence was to take a different direction under the leadership of Mahatma Gandhi in later years. Sure, later day shaheeds like Bhagat Singh were inspired by the Gadar story, but they themselves represented one tangential trajectory of the freedom struggle.

Inevitably, then, the question after all these years: What impact did this movement have on India's struggle for Independence? I am not a professional historian and cannot make a considered assessment. As even a casual reading of Indian history tells us there are so many interpretations of 1857 from 'mutiny' to 'first war of independence' and later, so many twists and turns even under Gandhi's leadership that I can only believe in the 'happenstance' school of history: One thing happens after another and let us leave it to the academics to find patterns.

But from a purely local and personal point of view, not that it is important, if the association with the Gadar movement resulted in the Indian government locating the consulate in San Francisco rather than elsewhere, it has certainly touched our lives in indirect and unintended ways.

Year after year in San Francisco, as we celebrate August 15 and raise the Indian flag, we remember the hopes, the idealism and the sacrifices of a distant past on these distant shores and render our Lal Salaam to the photos of the heroes on the walls of the austere premises of the historical Gadar memorial.

B S Prakash is India's consul general in San Francisco and can be reached at cg@cgisf.org

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...