Skip to main content

For Government Assistance Great Britain Asks: What Sex Are You?

Now that Great Britain asks for your sexual orientation for grants, it is only appropriate that we have our own sexual orientation questionnaires to match their questions. Next thing you know we can have the Gay Police to ensure that all "abnormal sexual identity" people are clearly marked with their own giant "G" for gay identification card. Of course if you live in Canada you can simply get your Pink Pistols ID Card.

We need the "Queer Cops" "Lesbian Vampire Patrol" "Tranny Gender Mosaic" "Crack Ho Ministry" or "Crack Ho Patrol" "Dykes on Bikes" I could go on but will save you the expletives with the note that any judgement of sexual orientation is a clear violation of persons right to enjoy life, liberty or the pursuit of their own happiness.

If Americans ever reach the point where we need to identify their sexual orientation to receive assistance from the government, I am confident I will self-identify as "Other: Crab-Eating or Japanese Macaque." I am very confused about which one I am more like?


I mean, like the Crab-Eating Macaque I enjoy helping females groom their fur and sometimes decorate it before and after I mate with them (unlike other species); and the grooming process itself often leads to coitus especially in hot water during winters like the Japanese Macaque, and I want the female Macaque to gather resources for me while I care for the young primates and prepare food resources?

I mean, it makes sense for a sensitive straight male right? I mean, I am socially in about the same position as a Macaque considering how many women like the Gelada Baboon (or Brad Pitt) type.

Overall such uncomfortable questions have about the same ontological value as asking someone if they are gay, bi-sexual, transgendered, straight, homosexual or lesbian on a government form....

They are inherently discriminatory because once you identify yourself one way how can you change it?

So now you know the horrible truth I am a sensitive male Macaque that likes to mate with female humans- why the hell should I care what you are?

Why not just allow people to be as wonderful, terrible and wacky as they are? As long as they are not hurting anyone why do we feel the need in our insecurity to stigmatize people? If I want to love women, the government does not ask me any questions.

Why should it be different for anyone else?

Oh yeah, I remember because you fag hags are thinking of the movie Boys Beware....
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...
44 comments
Read more

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...
70 comments
Read more

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...
31 comments
Read more