Skip to main content

An Open Letter to Mr. Michael E. Szymanczyk, Chairman & CEO, The Altria Group


Mr. Michael E. Szymanczyk
Chairman & CEO
The Altria Group

6601 West Broad Street
Richmond, VA 23230


Dear Mr. Szymanczyk,

I am writing in regard to the possible return of $708,000 from your subsidiary, Kraft General Foods, to the State of Delaware.

No, I'm not kidding.

Last week, Delaware Governor Ruth Ann Minner announced the award of this grant to help expand your plant in Dover, a project to which (as I understand it) Altria has already committed some $40 million. We appreciate the expansion of this plant, along with the forty new jobs it will create; like Governor Minner, I also enjoy Crystal Light Peach Iced Tea mix.

But as a parent of school-age children and as a Delaware taxpayer I'm asking you to consider returning the money.

Here's the situation: massive budget shortfalls in Delaware are about to result in the State having to ask each of our nineteen school districts to give back $8-10 million for the upcoming 2008-2009 academic year. This will translate into the loss of hundreds of teaching positions, the elimination of many desperately needed services for special needs students, and the curtailment of both after-school programs and athletics for thousands of Delaware school children.

I realize that the $708,000 Kraft received will only address a tiny percentage of Delaware's public education deficit.

I also realize that neither you nor any Delaware officials knew this would happen when you applied for the grant.

But I am equally certain that, given the commitment of the Altria Group to serving and improving the communities in which you have facilities (your website speaks of $1.4 BILLION in charitable contributions), you would not want to accept this money with the knowledge that it was funding plant expansion at the cost of educating the children of your workers.

My twins at HB DuPont Middle School and my grandson (who will start full-day kindergarten this fall if money can be restored to the program) appreciate your consideration of this request, as do I.

Sincerely,

Steve Newton

Comments

Anonymous said…
Steve,

I've been pretty hard on Kraft Foods over at Kilroy's. I don't blame them because Minner was waving $708,000.00 in their face.

I would say to the good people of Kraft Foods, please consider give back $708,000.00 is a form a a grant divding the amount and giving equal parts to each Delaweare School distrcits including the charter schools.
Things are so tight in our public schools even copy paper is rationed.

Minnernomics has ruined our state's economy and schools
Nancy Willing said…
Delaware politicians have the audacity to 'do' for constituents that which stands to hurt the rest of us. Minner's offering to pay for only state employees health care when Aetna was going to reduce procedural anethesia.
Minner's Kent loyalty comes into play for the 40 jobs and the factory in 'her' town.
In 2004 she quieted the angry Kent voices of Garrison Lake community but sealing a deal with Pam Scott-Paul Clarky, Nathan Hayward and Jay Sonecha, Garrison's developer for a trade where the state bought the golf course and the state will pay for many tens of millions worth of the City of Bayberry's roads(and enriching her campaign at the same time by tens of thousands from Jay Sonecha).
Steve, this is a fantastic letter, and should serve as an example. I am going to write my own (it is difficult to improve upon perfection, so I will have to suffice with my own meager attempt).

Thanks for the inspiration.
mejor sexshop said…
To my mind everybody have to glance at it.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

Soda tax debate reveals fundamental progressive assertions about your lack of individual rights and the "responsiblities" of the State

I thought it would be at least amusing to use the Delawareliberal comments as sub-headings regarding each category of what is wrong with the proposed tax on sodas and juice drinks. But there are so many different little strands of each comment that it would be impossible to pull them all out. So, instead, I'm going to let you read them in more or less the order they appeared, and note the assumptions. pandora: I’m perfectly okay with taxing sodas and juice drinks. Mainly because they’re total crap, and one of the main reasons our country’s children are overweight. They are also dirt cheap. Assumptions here: (1) Because "I" am perfectly okay with a new tax it should be imposed on everybody; (2) it is the government's responsibility to keep children from being obese; (3) the cheapness of the product to be taxed justifies charging people more for it. John Manifold: Soda fattens your kids [and you and your husband], shortens their lives, costs more than water [a...