Skip to main content

Our largest creditor demands a new global currency: bring on the black helicopters and the North American Union

From Al Jazeera:

The head of the Chinese central bank has called for a new global currency controlled by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), saying such a move would give governments particularly in the developing world the ability to manage their economies more efficiently.

In an online essay Zhou Xiaochuan, governor of the People's Bank of China, said the global financial crisis had exposed the danger of relying on one nation's currency for international payments.

The essay, released on the bank's website late on Monday, did not mention the US dollar by name, but the vast majority of international finance is carried out in dollars.

The comments come ahead of a major meeting of leaders from the Group of 20 major economies in London which will focus on measures to alleviate the global economic crisis.

During the meeting, beginning on April 2, China is expected to call for developing economies to have a bigger say in global finance and step up pressure for changes to a system dominated by the US dollar and Western governments.

The unusual step of publishing Zhou's essay in both Chinese and English versions is seen as indicating his comments are aimed at an international audience ahead of the G20 meeting.

China has become increasingly assertive in economic issues and while the global financial crisis has hit Chinese export industries hard, its leaders are also viewing the crisis as a potential opportunity to increase China's global clout.


Here's a safe bet: President Obama will not dismiss this out of hand, but call for discussion and study.

Comments

David said…
It should be very concerning. It is a vote of non confidence. The sad part is that they have a valid point. The world shouldn't suffer from our current fiscal insanity.
Anonymous said…
The world will continue to gravitate toward the most reliable currency. I would guess that we have about four years, Obama's first term, to demonstrate that we are putting our house back in order, following several decades of decline, thus validating China's investment in our paper. I'm sure Obama is concerned.

It should also be noted that China is part of our problem, in that they arbitrarily hold the value of their currency virtually constant, thus vastly favoring their export business, especially to the US. They also have massive pollution problems and horrible working conditions for their people, of little concern to our corporations as judged by the outflow of American jobs to China and others in the East.

The lowest price carries with it the cost of unintended consequences like pollution, poor working conditions, sacrifices of human rights, and loss of domestic jobs. Our government must have a voice against these problems.

Under laissez faire economics, we have been heading in the same direction as China, wrt neglecting pollution issues, neglecting workplace health concerns, and developing a highly stratified society with the bulk of the wealth in the upper several percent of the population. A more balanced government - business relationship is required to save us from ourselves.

I think President Obama understands this well, as his recovery programs include addressing these issues, to the consternation of those who would beat on him in order to push forward ideologies that have been demonstrated to be flawed in terms of practical, more desirable results for the average American family.

Perry Hood
Anonymous said…
You forgot to close the talking points playbook at the conclusion of your last comment, Perry.
Delaware Watch said…
But Obama did dismiss it out of hand last night during his press conference. When asked if he thinks the world needs a world currency he said "No." End of discussion.
Tyler Nixon said…
No Dana. He said "I don't believe that there's a need for a global currency."

Adding "at this time" would have completed this hedge.

So it is hardly a resounding 'no'.

As we know, Obama's "belief" could change as easily as the rest of his positions.

Also, what does anyone expect the POTUS to say?

Personally I would have expected a more resounding statement of confidence in the U.S. dollar.

So, hardly "end of discussion."
Anonymous said…
Jason Scott (queue Hube) and I have every-so-often been predicting the North American Union since about mid-'06. It's gonna happen, or some whacked out "official" synergy plan that will lock Mexico-US-Canada as a unit, while recognizing what will effectively be superficial borders on a map. I just want some duty-free AUTHENTIC tacos with some griddled fatback. Is that so wrong?

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...