Skip to main content

Having nothing to do with politics: A. E. van Vogt and why you should read him





Nothing in today's world is as out of date as a dead science fiction writer who stopped publishing in the late 1980s when Alzheimer's struck him. The technology in his stories is out of date, his futures have been superseded, and unless someone picks him up for a classic reprint, he's relegated to eBay and the second-hand bookstores.

I mean, look at him--even the suit is cheesy.

But I want to make the case that you should go out and find, and then read reverently, some of the best (and even some of the worst) of A. E. van Vogt's work.

The beginning of modern science fiction is generally traced not to the appearance of the first story by Isaac Asimov or Robert Heinlein, but to the appearance of Van Vogt's Black Destroyer in John W. Campbell's Astounding during the summer of 1939. This story would later become a major inspiration for Ridley Scott's Alien movies.

Within a few years Van Vogt would establish himself as one of the titans of science fiction, with his most-remember creations being Slan [which has recently had a posthumous sequel--Slan Hunter by Kevin J. Anderson--crafted from Van Vogt's notes]; a classic Libertarian story The Weapon Shops of Isher [voted by the Science Fiction Writers of America as one of the best twenty SF stories of all time back in the 1970s]; and his Null-A trilogy, loosely based on the concepts of General Semantics.

Oddly, none of those--with the possible exception of the first Null-A books is among my favorites, primarily because they are all too ... polished.

Van Vogt wrote based on an obscure system that required him to break every story into 800-word scenes, and to literally try to send you on some kind of plot twist at the end of each scene. He would set his alarm clock at night to wake him up at odd hours, then scribble down what he could remember of his current dream (having gone to sleep with the conscious injunction to think about the plot he was working on), so that he could incorporate that into the next scene.

Then there were the fix-up novels. Having specialized in short stories and novelettes in the early 1940s, Van Vogt gave up writing for a time (wherein he partnered with L. Ron Hubbard at the start of the Scientology movement), but then suddenly needed money. Paperback novels were just coming into play in the early 1950s, so Van Vogt--instead of writing new novels--just apparently randomly gathered together bunches of old short stories and novelettes, fixing them up into short novels of about 60,000 words.

The results were not surprisingly ... uneven.

But that's Van Vogt. You don't read him because all the plot elements get neatly tied up at the end, because sometimes he throws in so many ideas that only a gigantic sleight of hand, complemented by scientific mumbo-jumbo, can bring the story to an end.

Along the way, however, you will find brilliant characterization, incredible investigations of the nature of consciousness, deeply layer future societies, and some of the most interesting aliens you'd ever want not to be eaten by.

By the late 1950s Van Vogt had started writing original works again (including collaborations with James Schmitz and Harlan Ellison), but a lot of people thought he was past his prime, and that his later work couldn't hold a candle to the earlier (somewhat like Robert Heinlein when you think about it). I disagree. There are absolute pieces of brilliance in The Darkness at Diamondia, The Anarchistic Colossus, Future Glitter, and Cosmic Encounter.

One of Van Vogt's least know works is a novel called The Violent Man, a non-SF story of an American held in a Chinese brainwashing experiment in the late 1950s or early 1950s. If you can get past the fact that every woman in the Orient seems to want to fall into the sack with our anti-hero, it is one of the most amazing books on conditions in Maoist China every written.

Baen Books has just republished a bunch of short stories and novelettes in a trade paperback collection entitled Transgalactic, but I don't think it represents Van Vogt's best work (although at that it's pretty damn good).

I can't give you an order in which to read his books, because finding them is becoming progressively more difficult.

But here are my favorites:

Cosmic Encounter Late; hard to find; aliens vs Elizabethan pirates along with multiple timelines and the collapse of the universe into its original constituent atom (no kidding).

Future Glitter Simply the most amazing treatment of a world-wide Stalinist totalitarian state you will ever read.

The Anarchistic Colossus The Fleet went out and beat the aliens and came home (but not really, the aliens just messed with their minds) and now an Earth with no government is about to be invaded, except that.... Naw, I'm not telling.

Earth's Last Fortress [also as Masters of Time] A recruiting station for a future war is opened in the present--but is it by the bad guys or the good guys?

The Man with a Thousand Names Forget the plot, which involves body transmission between the stars and other improbabilities; the thing about this story is that the main character is completely unlikeable, never becomes likable, and yet Van Vogt manages to make you empathize with him and eventually root for him.

Supermind, Quest for the Future, and The Universe Maker are all fix-ups in which--at times--come completely apart. The characterizations are so deft and the ideas so intriguing that you won't care that the last third of the plot makes no sense.

No links except this--to the best A E Van Vogt site on the Net. (It was just updated last week--this guy cares about his material).

Comments

Anonymous said…
I have only read World of Null-A and the Players of Null-A. I did so in preparation of John C. Wright's Null-A Continuum, because, even though I don't normally care for people continuing other's works, Wright earned my slavering adoration with his Golden Age trilogy.

I found that Van Vogt, even with horribly outdated science, and a very 1940s/50s sort of view of the feature, swept me up and kept me hooked. It had been a very, very long time since a book had hooked me quite the way two books I expected to be relatively boring did.

It was like being caught in a river and being swept along helplessly. You get it all-- good and bad.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

Soda tax debate reveals fundamental progressive assertions about your lack of individual rights and the "responsiblities" of the State

I thought it would be at least amusing to use the Delawareliberal comments as sub-headings regarding each category of what is wrong with the proposed tax on sodas and juice drinks. But there are so many different little strands of each comment that it would be impossible to pull them all out. So, instead, I'm going to let you read them in more or less the order they appeared, and note the assumptions. pandora: I’m perfectly okay with taxing sodas and juice drinks. Mainly because they’re total crap, and one of the main reasons our country’s children are overweight. They are also dirt cheap. Assumptions here: (1) Because "I" am perfectly okay with a new tax it should be imposed on everybody; (2) it is the government's responsibility to keep children from being obese; (3) the cheapness of the product to be taxed justifies charging people more for it. John Manifold: Soda fattens your kids [and you and your husband], shortens their lives, costs more than water [a...