Skip to main content

Nobody cares.

It's not like he's actually running our non-existent foreign policy, anyway.

The picture that proves Secretary of State John Kerry HAS been out on his boat while Egypt plunges into chaos - after his spokesman denied he had been sailing in Nantucket

Comments

delacrat said…
Let the Egyptians sort out Egypt.

Let Kerry go sailing.

Amen.
Anonymous said…
What's amazing about the modus operandi on display here is that we are so conditioned now to seeing incompetence like this exposed on a daily basis (a la jerking off in the middle of a major middle east power crisis) that we don't even blink any more at the brazen bald-faced lying that accompanies it.

This now SOP with the serial-lying lefty lifer elites (Kerrys, Clintons, Bidens, Obamas, etc etc) is only more execrable for how it is now done by sending out an endless stream of obeisant flunkies to do their lying for them (I'm looking right at you former Time Magazine pseudo-journalist A-hole Jay Carney).

It should disgust anyone even remotely acquainted with ethics or public integrity how casually and frequently these people now just flat-out lie about pretty much anything and everything, even EASILY-verifiable facts as simple as their actual physical whereabouts at a given time.

You have to wonder how deep and wide their capacity for unflinching deceit must be about matters not so easily verifiable or obvious but far more grave and consequential than their mendacious bullshit.

How drunk do you have to be on your own sense of might and power not only to lie and deceive whenever and however it suits you, but without a care or even thought that you might OR EVEN SHOULD ever be held accountable. Forget being scandalized out of office in shame, as would have been assured with this kind of high official corruption as recently as 20 years ago in American political life,

Thank you piece of shit lying trash from hell Bubba Jefferson Clinton, the master of lies who, along with his megalomaniac wife, bludgeoned Americans for almost a decade with the most extensive, voluminous and unrepentant lying in high office ever recorded in American political history, Watergate included.

Even openly perjuring yourself WHILE YOU ARE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES could now be survived without a scratch as long as you can bleat louder than a stuck pig about how political enemies are trying to destroy you so you can't continue blessing humanity with your greatness.

Sadly, most rational, concerned citizens are so overwhelmed trying to get a handle on the ruling class's dangerous incompetence it is hard to keep up with the constant onslaught of daily lies and cover-ups...thus *snooooooooooooze* to how Zombie Elite John Kerry is a lying pig as much as a feckless self-absorbed sociopath.
mynym said…
What's amazing about the modus operandi on display here...

Read these books: (9/11 Ten Years Later: When State Crimes Against Democracy Succeed by David Ray Griffin)

(The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Final Official Report About 9/11 Is Unscientific and False
by David Ray Griffin)

Keeping in mind that studying is all that you're doing because: "We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors…and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do." (attributed to Karl Rove)

If the oligarchs and the ruling class gets sloppy with their lies about small things, so what? The fact that most of them got away with turning a blind eye to the Big Lie in order to maintain the geopolitical order and profit in their political careers and so forth is impressive, in its own way.

Nobody cares.
mynym said…
Steve, I noticed that you link to antiwar.com

I'm pretty sure they're still under investigation by the FBI. Just saying.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...