Skip to main content

On DSU the News Journal inverts chronology to give itself a pat on the back

My guess is that yesterday's refusal by DSU senior official to give the News Journal comments on its story about felon-dean Freddy Asinor rankled the reporters quite a bit.

But you really have to love the slick inversion of chronology that takes place in today's story.



In the first two paragraphs, the WNJ says

Delaware State University will review how it conducts background checks on job applicants and audit financial records of a former dean who has embezzlement and forgery convictions, officials announced Thursday. 
The university’s disclosure came hours after the The News Journal reported that some state lawmakers and university trustees urged a change in procedures and an audit.
This, of course, implies a cause and effect relationship to events:  we did the story and then we printed the outcry of legislators, and DSU administration (hitherto having failed to respond to the issue) caved to all the pressure.

Nice narrative.

The only problem is the paragraph in the story that is printed "below the fold":
Williams’ statement said that prior to hiring Asinor’s interim replacement this week, the school began a review of its background check process and an audit, the results of which will be shared with the board of trustees. 
In other words:  last week DSU had already begun the changes that the WNJ and opportunist politicians Patti Blevins and Greg Lavelle chided them for yesterday.

So the idea that the WNJ story prompted any of this action is just so much self-serving pap.

It is legitimate to ask why the DSU administration refused to comment to the WNJ yesterday, if such changes were already under way.

The answer is pretty simple:  in a meeting with DSU faculty and staff of the affected college yesterday, Provost and Academic Vice President Alton Thompson noted first, "The News Journal does not administer this institution."  OK, write that one off to irritability.

But Thompson also said that because the audit would be wide-ranging it was important to get all of the mechanisms into place before making a public announcement.

If you look back at the sordid affair of Freddy Asinor at Clemson it is fairly obvious that what he did there would have involved the tacit if not active participation of others.  If that happened at DSU it would be important to set up the mechanisms to find any potential collaborators or just those who should have known and should have caught any discrepancies before announcing the audit.

This is common sense.  The fact that DSU's announcement missed the WNJ press deadline yesterday in the interests of what Provost Thompson called "getting it right" is material only to the egos of some local politicians--neither of whom has actually ever done a single damn thing to support the university in the first place.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

Soda tax debate reveals fundamental progressive assertions about your lack of individual rights and the "responsiblities" of the State

I thought it would be at least amusing to use the Delawareliberal comments as sub-headings regarding each category of what is wrong with the proposed tax on sodas and juice drinks. But there are so many different little strands of each comment that it would be impossible to pull them all out. So, instead, I'm going to let you read them in more or less the order they appeared, and note the assumptions. pandora: I’m perfectly okay with taxing sodas and juice drinks. Mainly because they’re total crap, and one of the main reasons our country’s children are overweight. They are also dirt cheap. Assumptions here: (1) Because "I" am perfectly okay with a new tax it should be imposed on everybody; (2) it is the government's responsibility to keep children from being obese; (3) the cheapness of the product to be taxed justifies charging people more for it. John Manifold: Soda fattens your kids [and you and your husband], shortens their lives, costs more than water [a...