Skip to main content

kavips channels ... an inner Libertarian?

Actually, it is pretty much only garden-variety intellectual consistency, but these days that's not so common any more.

Thus, go read kavips' warning to Obama, Biden and the Democrats on regulating the Internet:

However, it would be fair to warn you that my support for the Constitution of the United States of America, and my sworn duty to obey it to the best of my abilities, has me fearful of some the changes you propose for public safety. As an American, I have the right to live unsafely if I wish…

So, with fair warning, any criteria you propose to tame the Internet, which limits the right I hold so dear, the right to express my opinion with impunity, will cause you to lose the battle of public opinion… because I will fight you there...

Comments

kavips said…
Garden variety?

Lol
There may be hope for kavips yet! LOL.
Anonymous said…
Go Kavips! I am with you. There is legislation right now to limit the internet. Its called the "Cyber Security Act". Beware!

Have any of you received a message from your provider that "you cannot send anymore emails for this hour"? Sorry its already happening. Yahoo and AOL are both attempting to put limits on the number of emails you can send.
kavips said…
This is so 2007 but we found out through court documents that the Feds have tapped the internet lines in San Francisco at the junctions where Yahoo, Google, Microsoft, and all internet servers intersect, grafted a line off from that into a another room and back in...

All information has been recorded since 2004... Everything... and still is...

If you "know someone" you can easily retrieve in about 4 days, an old email needed.. Which can be good if used for the forces of good, or it can be evil if used accordingly....

And Shirley... there is no, or ever will be hope for me.... fortunately which is why I blog: so that through my lost hope, I may create real hope for others... LOL.... and thanks.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici