Skip to main content

Going Green: Is the Market working?

Thinking about my own life, and the extent to which my family has gone "Green," and why:

I love big pickups. My Ford F-250 Supercab (12 mpg rolling downhill with a tailwind) was my pride and joy. I still miss it. I sold it 18 months ago when gas prices permanently got up over $2/gallon. Today on my 54-mile (each way) commute I drive a Nissan Sentra that is getting 36 mpg.

I like a lot of light in my house. My kids like it toasty warm or (in summer) cold enough to hang meat. Then electricity costs went through the roof, because we finally had to start paying something close to the real price of generation and transmission. I bought fluorescent light bulbs, not because they are ecologically sound, but because they now save me a bundle of money. I like money; I can get used to the fact that they take a few seconds to achieve full brightness. My kids can also get used to putting on some sweat pants, because the thermostat now goes no higher than 67 in the winter and no lower than 74 in the summer. When I get the chance, I turn the whole system off.

My family likes beef--steak, really. I used to buy really nice steaks, and everybody at the table got one. Some people chew down to the bone. Some don't. The price of beef started going through the roof. I buy meat that really shouldn't be called steak, and I have learned how to marinate and cook it correctly. I don't give everybody his/her own steak. I slice up two or three steaks (where there used to be five or six) and put the pieces on a plate. People serve themselves what they intend to eat. Everybody gets all they want, and there is usually just enough left for me to have a sandwich from the left-overs.

My wife is convinced that the tap water in Delaware is a major cause of cancer. My kids need bottled water for soccer games. I used to drink a lot of diet soda. The price of plastic bottled water and soda has inflated along with the gasoline prices. We bought some reusable plastic bottles (and we save the others that we sometimes have to buy on the road), a Brita water filter, and powdered diet lemonade mix. I get to have the pink lemonade when it's on sale. Everything tastes the same or even a little better, although I am still working on how to inject caffeine into lemonade.

The point?

None of these changes occurred because I was especially conscious of global warming. They occurred because, as scarcity and competitive demand forced prices up, I reached the point where the market drove me to make changes in my lifestyle.

I could have avoided these changes, but the opportunity cost was too high. We still got to take a 10-day vacation to Colorado this year because our electric bills, our food bills, and our gasoline bills, while rising in cost, haven't broken us yet. I took a vote (the kids each get one vote, I get four, my wife gets seventeen; anything that gets seventeen votes passes, regardless) and it was unanimous that we'd rather re-use the damn water bottles than miss summer vacation.

I have said it before, and I stand by the position: the market doesn't care about you, me, or global warming. And I am not enough of a Libertarian purist to believe that the market alone can solve a global economic/social/cultural/political problem.

But if my family's life is any indication, the market is making inroads.

Comments

Brian Shields said…
We've been doing the same thing here, adding compact fluorescents one bulb at a time, starting with the most used to the least. This way we minimized the initial costs of making the whole house go compact, resulting in a steady electric price. It hasn't gone up all winter. I close the heat vents in the bathrooms and watch how much hot water I use.

If I had my way, and the money to do so, I'd have a small windmill out back and a few solar panels on the roof. I'd add some insulation in the crawl space and temp seal the windows in the winter... but the powers that be (wife and in-laws) overrule my intentions.
Anonymous said…
Hi

We are the libertarian Alliance, in the UK (God help us!)

Great site. I am linking you into our bolg-roll now!

Keep it up! KBO!

David Davis

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...