Skip to main content

Going Green: Is the Market working?

Thinking about my own life, and the extent to which my family has gone "Green," and why:

I love big pickups. My Ford F-250 Supercab (12 mpg rolling downhill with a tailwind) was my pride and joy. I still miss it. I sold it 18 months ago when gas prices permanently got up over $2/gallon. Today on my 54-mile (each way) commute I drive a Nissan Sentra that is getting 36 mpg.

I like a lot of light in my house. My kids like it toasty warm or (in summer) cold enough to hang meat. Then electricity costs went through the roof, because we finally had to start paying something close to the real price of generation and transmission. I bought fluorescent light bulbs, not because they are ecologically sound, but because they now save me a bundle of money. I like money; I can get used to the fact that they take a few seconds to achieve full brightness. My kids can also get used to putting on some sweat pants, because the thermostat now goes no higher than 67 in the winter and no lower than 74 in the summer. When I get the chance, I turn the whole system off.

My family likes beef--steak, really. I used to buy really nice steaks, and everybody at the table got one. Some people chew down to the bone. Some don't. The price of beef started going through the roof. I buy meat that really shouldn't be called steak, and I have learned how to marinate and cook it correctly. I don't give everybody his/her own steak. I slice up two or three steaks (where there used to be five or six) and put the pieces on a plate. People serve themselves what they intend to eat. Everybody gets all they want, and there is usually just enough left for me to have a sandwich from the left-overs.

My wife is convinced that the tap water in Delaware is a major cause of cancer. My kids need bottled water for soccer games. I used to drink a lot of diet soda. The price of plastic bottled water and soda has inflated along with the gasoline prices. We bought some reusable plastic bottles (and we save the others that we sometimes have to buy on the road), a Brita water filter, and powdered diet lemonade mix. I get to have the pink lemonade when it's on sale. Everything tastes the same or even a little better, although I am still working on how to inject caffeine into lemonade.

The point?

None of these changes occurred because I was especially conscious of global warming. They occurred because, as scarcity and competitive demand forced prices up, I reached the point where the market drove me to make changes in my lifestyle.

I could have avoided these changes, but the opportunity cost was too high. We still got to take a 10-day vacation to Colorado this year because our electric bills, our food bills, and our gasoline bills, while rising in cost, haven't broken us yet. I took a vote (the kids each get one vote, I get four, my wife gets seventeen; anything that gets seventeen votes passes, regardless) and it was unanimous that we'd rather re-use the damn water bottles than miss summer vacation.

I have said it before, and I stand by the position: the market doesn't care about you, me, or global warming. And I am not enough of a Libertarian purist to believe that the market alone can solve a global economic/social/cultural/political problem.

But if my family's life is any indication, the market is making inroads.

Comments

Brian Shields said…
We've been doing the same thing here, adding compact fluorescents one bulb at a time, starting with the most used to the least. This way we minimized the initial costs of making the whole house go compact, resulting in a steady electric price. It hasn't gone up all winter. I close the heat vents in the bathrooms and watch how much hot water I use.

If I had my way, and the money to do so, I'd have a small windmill out back and a few solar panels on the roof. I'd add some insulation in the crawl space and temp seal the windows in the winter... but the powers that be (wife and in-laws) overrule my intentions.
Anonymous said…
Hi

We are the libertarian Alliance, in the UK (God help us!)

Great site. I am linking you into our bolg-roll now!

Keep it up! KBO!

David Davis

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici