Skip to main content

How far will statists go to collect taxes? Making senior citizens "work it off"

This in thanks to Will Fox at the Libertarian Party of Delaware listserv:

Towns all over the country have a new idea for collecting property taxes from senior citizens on fixed incomes: put them to work for the town government at low wages to pay off their debts to society.

According to CNN such programs now exist in Colorado, Massachusetts, New York, and South Carolina.

What's truly bizarre is that this is presented as some kind of boon to seniors:

Scott Parkin, spokesman for the National Council on Aging, said the program sounded interesting, as long as it wasn't limited to menial work. "It's certainly in line with what we stand for, keeping seniors involved in work or volunteering as a part of healthy aging," he said.

Boulder County, Colorado, pioneered a tax workoff program in 1986 for residents over 60 and now has about 250 applicants for the fewer than 100 openings, said spokeswoman Barbara Halpin. The work done by the seniors includes landscaping, gathering climate data, clipping newspapers and staffing the courthouse information booth.

"Taxes aren't that high out here, so even at $7 an hour people can burn off their county taxes pretty quickly," Halpin said. She added that many stay in the program as volunteers after paying off their taxes.


These towns are collecting their property taxes from senior citizens through municipal jobs paying roughly $7.00-$8.50/hour.

What I'm wondering is where are all the people who complain that senior citizens having to go take low-paying jobs at McDonalds to make ends meet represents a failure of the "social safety net," but the government paying them the same rate (just to re-collect it as property taxes) somehow becomes a humanitarian initiative.

Comments

Paul Smith Jr. said…
I'd been meaning to post on that as well.

By this logic, taxes can be raised as high as the government wishes, and we can all work second jobs for the government. Retirees shouldn't be forced out of retirement due to government greed. If retires are forced to take out jobs due to taxes, that's an obvious sign taxes are just too high.
Well, at least the US is keeping queers in their place.
Brian Shields said…
Just to play devil's advocate...

If the senior was more responsible during her working lifetime, and built up enough of a nest egg to afford her lifestyle, this wouldn't be an issue.
Brian
Under some circumstances I'd agree with that, but in some parts of the country property values and property tax assessments have been rising so rapidly that there's no real way anybody could have planned to keep up.

Take an example from Maine, about a couple I know personally, who purchased a house 30 years ago for $80K. The assessed value of that house topped $600K around 2004, and the property tax rates there have gone up nine times in the past 20 years.

Of course you could argue that by liquidating their house these people could get out from under their tax debt, but think about the propriety of forcing you to sell property that you've already paid for because the government can continually raise both the taxes and the valuation (even if you have no plans to sell the property).

Something is haywire here.
Paul Smith Jr. said…
The issue Steve raises is apparently a very real on in areas like San Francisco which saw property values (and taxes) explode in the first part of this decade. Seniors who had owned their homes for decades were all of a sudden in a position where their homes had increased in value so much (and taxes had been raised so high) that they couldn't afford the taxes on their homes anymore.
Brian Shields said…
So, if I observe this right, if the tax percentage is going up, they get more in fax funds, then if the valuation goes up, that percentage is worth more, they are receiving even more taxes.

So these taxes are being squandered, rates rising to recover, and the lesson of budgeting is never learned.

Therefore a society exists where seniors are forced into slavery to pay the government because they can't get their act together.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici