Skip to main content

Time to elect the head of Delaware public education?

Yes.

It's pretty simple.  We currently live in a one-party state, and even the honest Democrats will admit that the winners of the highest statewide offices are generally corporatists and not progressives (thought I have seen NO evidence that so-called progressives would actually be any better at governing).

Our Secretary of Education gets picked, routinely, by a corporate lackey, and is immediately the flack for Rodel, Race to the Top, Component V, Common Core, and whatever else is the Reform de Jure that Vision 2012 2015 2020 is pushing.

So let's try a thought experiment.  What would be the downside?


Education is entirely too technical and too important to trust to the will of the electorate, who might be deceived and pick some sort of demagogue instead of a skilled steward of the public good.

Yeah.  That's right.  That's why we elect the Attorney General, the State Treasurer, the Insurance Commissioner, the Mayor of Wilmington, and, you know, the Governor.  Because none of those offices actually require any sort of specialized knowledge or training to execute.

The best arguments that an elected Commissioner of Public Education couldn't be any worse than what we're getting now?  Jack Markell, Chip Flowers, Karen Weldin Stewart ...

The only decent Secretary of Education that Delaware has ever had since the post was created was Valerie Woodruff.  Valerie screamed at people when they didn't do what she told them to do.  She was a control freak.  Trapped with you in a bear trap, she'd chew off your leg to get out.

And she actually spent eight long years fighting for Delaware children, unlike the totality of the other incumbents in this position before and after her, who all considered Secretary of Education as a stepping stone to better things in bigger states.  Valerie left DOE and retired.  She always said she'd have kept working if someone would have let her be a principal and go back and show them how it was done, and I always wished someone had taken her up on the idea.  She'd have kicked ass.

The rest?  Pretty much losers.

How about this one?

Electing a Commissioner of Public Education would politicizing the process.

Yeah, right.  Education isn't politicized enough for you now, huh?  Suppose somebody actually had to campaign around the state and answer questions from parents ahead of time about what they'd do for, with, and to their kids?  Suppose they had to get their record vetted by the public, not a complacent and paid-off General Assembly that didn't even bother to question the last nominee for more than 45 minutes?

You could make it, like school board elections, a non-partisan election, but it's really not necessary.

God how I'd love to see the primaries for Commissioner of Public Education.

But here's the real reason why we won't see an elected head of Delaware public education:

The reformers know that if their many claims and much-vaunted strategies had to be put to the test before the voters, they'd fail.

Yes, it's really that simple.

Comments

Anonymous said…
absolutely, yes!
The Last Ephor said…
Can't we just push more towards privatization? Wouldn't that be preferable? I know that is an uphill battle but why not move in that direction?
Anonymous said…
Another elected office where monies are brought in from out of state to elect someone who will forward their agenda. Imagine the monies coming in from private corps looking for an in for their consultants/technology/teachers, etc. At least with an appointed person we know what agenda we are getting. No thanks. there is way too much BS in election as is.
kavips said…
Jumping the thread here, but Happy Veteran's Day to you...
kavips said…
I've never thought of this till reading this post...

What would happen if we had the General Assembly instead, elect the state row officers?

It wouldn't be the same as campaigning to the voters, but if a legislator voted for someone who turned out terrible, that person would have to be very careful his opponent didn't bludgeon him with that event pre-election day.

So some care and concern would go into the process, as well as publicity as schools, teachers, Rodel, unions, parents, school board, and lobbyists all had to contend for their choice...

I'm seeing it could become very hard to control the outcome, and I'm sort of thinking that could be a good thing.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...