Skip to main content

The State of the (corporate) State: Part Two (subtitled "Amnesia or dementia in Dover")

Here are actual excerpts from Governor Jack Markell's State of the State address, in the order that they appear in the speech (you may assume that at each line break there is a <>):
Only 20% of our kids graduate from high school ready for college or a career. 

Too many working Delawareans struggle to care for their families and put food on the table. 

We can’t eat our fish from the St. Jones. We can’t swim in too many parts of the Inland Bays. The Christina and Brandywine rivers are laced with toxic pollutants. . . .[A] century of pollution has impaired nearly every waterway in our state.  

We have one of the most rigid [public education] funding systems in the country. This leaves little room for school leaders – those who know our students best – to innovate, create a vision, and pursue it. 

Our starting salaries [for teachers] are not competitive with our neighbors. 

Wilmington is the business capital of the state and our cultural center, yet violent crime has engulfed neighborhoods and taken many lives. 

Far too often, gun violence is committed by shooters who cannot legally own guns . . . 

Many offenders guilty of drug offenses are denied a driver’s license – regardless of whether their crime had anything to do with a car. 

Delaware’s incarceration rate is higher than the national average in a country whose average is higher than the rest of the world’s.  

We lock up too many people for not making bail and not appearing at hearings. Forty percent of the women incarcerated at Baylor are pre-trial detainees, many charged with non-violent offenses. 

In addition to filling our prisons with pre-trial detainees, we also impose longer sentences than other states do. One reason is that we are the only state in the country that forces our judges, without exception, to impose consecutive rather than concurrent sentences for multiple offenses. 

Of 184 kids in custody at our Faulkland Road campus last year, only 11 were back in traditional schools six months later. Many kids drop out, are expelled, or are re-incarcerated. This is our failure.


And the conclusion one is supposed to reach when considering all that?

The state of our state is stronger today than when I addressed you a year ago.
So what I'm hearing is that a public education system failing (supposedly) 80% of its graduates despite tens of millions of additional Federal investments; a high population of struggling, working poor (25% of our State population is on Medicaid); all of our waterways are polluted; we have a bad education funding system that doesn't pay competitive salaries; Wilmington is engulfed with violent crimes committed primarily by people whom last year's gun control measures wouldn't touch; we punish non-violent drug offenders by taking away their ability to travel (like, forever); we lock up way too many people; our bail system discriminates against the poor; our judges are required to give ridiculous sentences; and our rehabilitation efforts are dismal failures . . .

. . . but this represents PROGRESS?

Wow, if this year the State of Delaware is so much improved over last year, I wonder what Governor Markell said about it then?

Oddly enough, in that speech, Governor Markell never mentioned that 80% of our graduates are not college ready--he only talked about what great schools we have.

Oddly enough, in that speech, Governor Markell never mentioned the fact that all of our waterways are polluted.

Oddly enough, in that speech, Governor Markell promised strong action by Attorney General Beau Biden and the Delaware State Police that was going to make a dent in violent crime in Wilmington [this year, according to the Governor, it's pretty much the Mayor's problem].

Oddly enough, in that speech, Governor Markell didn't identify Delaware as incarcerating too many people or failing in our rehabilitation efforts.

Oddly enough, in that speech, our need for massive infrastructure improvements that are the cornerstone of longstanding need this year, are never highlighted and no investment is requested.

Oddly enough, in that speech, Governor Markell closes by telling us he is committed to pruning the budget, keeping our taxes low, and avoiding too much debt.

I am forced to conclude that one of the figures giving the State of the State speech in 2013 or 2014 was not really Jack Markell, but an evil alien duplicate who was sent to Earth to ruin a Democratic Governor's credibility by making him say completely contradictory things.

Then I remembered:  this is Delaware, silly, where it is a bigger misdeed to talk about how our politicians are jerking us around than it is for them to jerk us around in the first place.

Never mind.

Comments

Anonymous said…
After cross referencing your take with Nancy's, there could be a third reason this State of the State was lame compared to previous ones.

I beat him up, and I know you did, as well as the educational establishment over the promises made in his last one and how they differed from the reality of his governing. I think he learned from it.. :)

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...