Skip to main content

This is the schizophrenia of Big Government

OK, so tomorrow there will come the official announcement that President Bush has worked out an agreement with the banking industry to freeze those adjustable-rate sub-prime mortgage rates for five years.

This exercise exmplifies--on all sides--what is wrong with the pattern of Big Government intervention in the economy.

Let me count the ways.

1) People who took out loans they could not afford have been bailed out of the consequences of their actions, by money from those of us who acted responsibly. My family is currently paying fixed mortgages on three pieces of property that are at least 1-1 1/2 percentage points above those of people who took out 5-year ARMs. We, and millions of others like us who maintained good credit and did our research have now been penalized millions if not billions of dollars.

2) Many of the people who will be "rescued" by this deal are not struggling middle-class homeowners but real estate speculators attemtping to quickly "flip" houses for a profit. Exactly why they should be given retroactive venture capitalism insurance I'm not sure.

3) Lenders who continued to offer teaser rates and impossible sub-prime mortgages to people with poor or over-extended credit have now been rewarded. They won't make the huge percentage rate interest jumps, but most of them never expected to. What they deserved was have those loans go bad, go into foreclosure, and to lose all the profits. If they went out of business due to poor business practices, too damn bad for them.

4) The US government chose to ignore this whole issue for years until it blew up in everyone's face. Now there were two choices available to the government with regard to this issue. An interventionist government could have attacked the problem several years ago by changing the rules to make this sort of blatant real estate speculation more difficult or at least better regulated. Or the government could have followed a laissez faire approach of allowing the whole travesty to play out, including the shake-out in the economy after the fact. The problem: our leaders did neither, or, more correctly they attempt to have the best of both worlds. They played non-intervention during the bubble and paternalist during the burst.

5) Both improvident people and irresponsible businesses now have another example of how Papa Washington will bail them out of bad decisions at the expense of the rest of us, which--instead of allowing them to learn from their behavior--encourages them to do it again.


A Libertarian perspective (at least mine) would suggest that the government's primary obligation was to make reasonable rules for market-based transactions ahead of time, provide information on risks and consequences to all parties, and then--if everyone was intent upon a trainwreck, trust market forces to settle it out. That settlement is often painful, but we're frankly overdue. We never paid the overt price for the savings and loan debacle, the airline collapse, or a variety of other fiascos in which the government stepped in to bail out the guilty and the guileless. Like constantly oversteering an automobile on ice, these little over-corrections mount up and eventually lead us closer and closer to real collapse.

Meanwhile, during the five year grace period, guess how many investors from China, Japan, and Dubai will be buying up American real estate at bargain prices.

Comments

Brian Shields said…
Amen.

If people were dumb enough to fall for loans they couldn't afford in the first place, if lenders were greedy enough to offer loans to them.. then they deserve the spanking they get when they get caught.

If interest rates were at record lows, and they offer you an adjustable rate.... where do you think it's going to go? y 19 year old sister, who cares more about Hairspray and the latest American Idols cd, and nothing about real estate, knows it was a bad idea!

Greed, house fever, something for nothing... This 'economy' fever everyone seems to be sick with will come to bite our debt-laden butts sooner than later. The more I read, the more I want to put cash under my mattress.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?