Skip to main content

Chique Poverty

Poverty is not the normal place you would expect to find the well to do. But today thanks largely to a socially minded young man named Marcelo Armstrong who took a few tourists into Rocinha, Rio de Janeiro's largest favela, or shantytown, you find people from all walks of life slumming it.

From rap music in the United States, to the development of favela tourism or barrio tourism in Latin America and Asia one finds that being poor, while it has innumerable hardships, is becoming cool. Of course while one must be excessively poor to get a visit from Bono or Angelina Jolie & Brad Pitt, the middle class can now revel in their relative affluence, despite their growing minority status. Favela tourism is often called by its critics an form of exploitative practice; but is it?

Many times shanty tourism brings much needed money into the barrio and into the life of the people who need it the most: the poor. When entrepreneurial minded, poverty stricken people become self-taught artists and musicians it can be a cultural tourism boon. Often these formerly poor rise out of poverty through contact with those who are not poor. In much the same way that uber stars Brad Pitt & Angelina Jolie can adopt a Cambodian child, in some way similar those among the well to do can visit those less fortunate and bring the the hard cash they need to pay bills.

Aside from the inherent dangers involved in this meeting for both the poor and relatively rich, such a meeting is not all together a bad thing, but is it moral? When morality raises its head within the markets, one is tempted to side with the critics of favela tourism, but at the same time, it must be recognized that it is not too different from John the Savage in Brave New World. And one can only hope that the tragedy of realizing you are part of tourism for the "select" class will not end with the same tragedy for the poor who are unique and sometimes wonderful individual people.

Armenia in particular suffers from a large burden of childhood poverty that no one except Armenians and UNICEF seem to care about. Not even Cher.

Of course, movies like Trainspotting and Sid and Nancy have always reveled in the all-or-nothing lifestyle of the "poor" artist drug-addict.

Poverty, in some well-to-do circles, has become as chique as Gucci handbag in the 1980's. What to make of it, is another matter. One can only await the arrival of Chinese tourists to gawk at all of us "quaint, traditional, poor American people." At that point I can get hard cash from the farang. Maybe at some point being poor and white will be good enough to get your kids adopted by Madonna, Bono or Agenlina Jolie just like Ireland in the 19th century.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...