Skip to main content

Altria Group downgraded to sell, sell, sell for lack of soul. . . .


Regular readers will recall that I recently posted An Open Letter to Mr. Michael E. Szymanczyk, Chairman & CEO, The Altria Group, regarding the return of the $708,000 of our tax money that Governor Ruth Ann Minner gave away to Kraft General Foods within a week of announcing that every public school district in the state would have to cough up $8-10 million in budget cuts.

I sent the letter directly to Mr Szymanczyk (no answer yet) and also to the Contributions & Communities section of the Altria Group.

They, at least, have answered. Sort of.

Here is the text of the response:

Thank you for requesting support from Altria Group, Inc. for Children of Kraft General Foods.

Altria Group's contributions program focuses on supporting organizations in the areas of hunger relief, domestic violence prevention, and the arts. All of our grant making is conducted through an invitation only application process. Only organizations with which we have a funding history are eligible to apply. We do not accept unsolicited proposals. If you would like to learn more about our philanthropic program, please visit our Web site at www.altria.com.

We wish you all the best in your fundraising efforts.

To learn more about our contributions program, please visit our Web site at: www.altria.com/contributions.

Thank you for contacting the Altria family of companies.

Corporate Communications

Altria Client Services


First note that this is not an automated reply. Somebody actually had to read my letter in order to pull out the chunk "for the Children of Kraft General Foods."

Now let's see what Altria's position is: you can only receive charitable funds from us if we invite you to apply. We only invite those to apply that we have previously funded.

OK--let's be honest. I didn't expect Altria to return the money; I didn't even really expect to receive a reply.

But what I do expect is that Jack Markell, John Carney, or (God help me) Mike Protack take a stand against corporate welfare, especially at a time when Delaware apparently cannot even pay for its schools.

Of course, as Intercourse says on Down with Absolutes:

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and has feathers, its a well-funded sleazy politician who’s bought and paid for and screw the rest of you if it waddles to a win in November.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

Soda tax debate reveals fundamental progressive assertions about your lack of individual rights and the "responsiblities" of the State

I thought it would be at least amusing to use the Delawareliberal comments as sub-headings regarding each category of what is wrong with the proposed tax on sodas and juice drinks. But there are so many different little strands of each comment that it would be impossible to pull them all out. So, instead, I'm going to let you read them in more or less the order they appeared, and note the assumptions. pandora: I’m perfectly okay with taxing sodas and juice drinks. Mainly because they’re total crap, and one of the main reasons our country’s children are overweight. They are also dirt cheap. Assumptions here: (1) Because "I" am perfectly okay with a new tax it should be imposed on everybody; (2) it is the government's responsibility to keep children from being obese; (3) the cheapness of the product to be taxed justifies charging people more for it. John Manifold: Soda fattens your kids [and you and your husband], shortens their lives, costs more than water [a...