Skip to main content

An Open Letter to Mr. Michael E. Szymanczyk, Chairman & CEO, The Altria Group

Mr. Michael E. Szymanczyk
Chairman & CEO
The Altria Group

6601 West Broad Street
Richmond, VA 23230

Dear Mr. Szymanczyk,

I am writing in regard to the possible return of $708,000 from your subsidiary, Kraft General Foods, to the State of Delaware.

No, I'm not kidding.

Last week, Delaware Governor Ruth Ann Minner announced the award of this grant to help expand your plant in Dover, a project to which (as I understand it) Altria has already committed some $40 million. We appreciate the expansion of this plant, along with the forty new jobs it will create; like Governor Minner, I also enjoy Crystal Light Peach Iced Tea mix.

But as a parent of school-age children and as a Delaware taxpayer I'm asking you to consider returning the money.

Here's the situation: massive budget shortfalls in Delaware are about to result in the State having to ask each of our nineteen school districts to give back $8-10 million for the upcoming 2008-2009 academic year. This will translate into the loss of hundreds of teaching positions, the elimination of many desperately needed services for special needs students, and the curtailment of both after-school programs and athletics for thousands of Delaware school children.

I realize that the $708,000 Kraft received will only address a tiny percentage of Delaware's public education deficit.

I also realize that neither you nor any Delaware officials knew this would happen when you applied for the grant.

But I am equally certain that, given the commitment of the Altria Group to serving and improving the communities in which you have facilities (your website speaks of $1.4 BILLION in charitable contributions), you would not want to accept this money with the knowledge that it was funding plant expansion at the cost of educating the children of your workers.

My twins at HB DuPont Middle School and my grandson (who will start full-day kindergarten this fall if money can be restored to the program) appreciate your consideration of this request, as do I.


Steve Newton


Anonymous said…

I've been pretty hard on Kraft Foods over at Kilroy's. I don't blame them because Minner was waving $708,000.00 in their face.

I would say to the good people of Kraft Foods, please consider give back $708,000.00 is a form a a grant divding the amount and giving equal parts to each Delaweare School distrcits including the charter schools.
Things are so tight in our public schools even copy paper is rationed.

Minnernomics has ruined our state's economy and schools
Nancy Willing said…
Delaware politicians have the audacity to 'do' for constituents that which stands to hurt the rest of us. Minner's offering to pay for only state employees health care when Aetna was going to reduce procedural anethesia.
Minner's Kent loyalty comes into play for the 40 jobs and the factory in 'her' town.
In 2004 she quieted the angry Kent voices of Garrison Lake community but sealing a deal with Pam Scott-Paul Clarky, Nathan Hayward and Jay Sonecha, Garrison's developer for a trade where the state bought the golf course and the state will pay for many tens of millions worth of the City of Bayberry's roads(and enriching her campaign at the same time by tens of thousands from Jay Sonecha).
Steve, this is a fantastic letter, and should serve as an example. I am going to write my own (it is difficult to improve upon perfection, so I will have to suffice with my own meager attempt).

Thanks for the inspiration.
mejor sexshop said…
To my mind everybody have to glance at it.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — they are i