Skip to main content

Senator Colin Bonini gets it right on the budget; big surprise: the rest of Leg Hall doesn't

Three caveats before I start:

1) I have never been a great fan of Senator Colin Bonini, despite the fact that many Libertarians in Delaware see him as one of the most Libertarian Republicans in the State. He's always been too much of a social conservative for my taste. I bring that up only to make the point that when I give him props, I seriously mean it. And with his vote to override on eminent domain, coupled with the information in this post--well, I have to admit that I may have been doing him a disservice.

2) I think the DSTP should be replaced. So that might make it sound paradoxical below when I argue about the nature of the DSTP cuts. However, read my argument with this sentence appended in your head: "As long as we have the DSTP on the books..."

3) I don't have the usual number of links in this story because either the Snooze Journal's website is too convoluted for this technopeasant or they're playing tricks with the stories. I can't find the story that appears on today's front page of the print edition. If I find it later, I'll update.

Here's the meat of the matter, and why as a Libertarian I generally don't trust government to get it right:

Among the cuts to public education made to balance the budget, our genius legislators decided to cut the funds for mandatory summer school, re-testing, and extra instructional services for students who fail one or more sections of the DSTP.

That's right: they decided to cut the budget that supports the poorest performing academic students. They left intact and untouched monies for all sorts of goodies for gifted and talented kids, all sorts of neat educational pork that qualifies as flash and glitter, and the bastards cut the funds for the kids who can't read, write, or cipher well enough to be promoted to the next grade.

You want to know what's worse? They did this in the epilogue of the bill, and weren't even going to debate it in public until Senator Bonini stepped up to the plate and brought it into the light.

So as soon as I get the complete list of legislators who voted to punish students performing poorly in school while leaving millions of dollars of untouched pork, I'm going to take a page from the book of Delaware Dem over at Delawareliberal [just replace all references to "eminent domain" and "SB 245" with "public education" and the "2009 budget" and you've got it]:

Do not dare say anything in any future campaign, whether it be this year or in 2010 or 2012, that in any way gives an implication that you were supportive of Senate Bill 245 or protecting the property rights of Delawareans. Your vote last night washed away any prior yes vote on Senate Bill 245 or any prior supportive statement of property rights.

I will be watching all future statements and campaign releases from you to make sure you tell the truth on this. And we bloggers get that politics isn’t easy. We are in it for the long haul. And we have terrific memories.


Bastards....

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...