Skip to main content

Afghan war costs to eclipse Iraq budget in 2010: I really do not mind saying, "I told you so"

Here is the current news:

With US military commitments to Afghanistan forever on the rise, and the president still tenatively planning to slash the Iraq force by August of next year, budget documents from the Pentagon suggest that the costs of the war in Afghanistan will eclipse the war in Iraq in 2010.

Of the $130 billion the Obama Administration is seeking in its 2010 budget for overseas missions, $65 billion is allocated for Afghanistan and only $61 billion for Iraq. Vice Admiral Steve Stanley says “this request is where you’re going to first see the swing of not only dollars or resources, but combat capability, from the Iraqi theater into the Afghan theater.”


In other words: no Iraq withdrawal dividend is in the cards, as I explained in detail five months ago, well before the current administration took office.

Military interventionism--either Bush style or Obama style--is expensive. That's why--even after electing a President who promised us change--the Defense Budget continues to go up, and up, and up....

Comments

Delaware Watch said…
When did Obama ever say that he wouldn't increase military spending or that he wouldn't escalate the war in Afghanistan? I can tell you: never. In fact, he RAN FOR OFFICE on those platforms. So what, then, did you predict that anyone couldn't read for herself by visiting Obama's campaign website and or by listening to his campaign speeches and talks?
Dana
It is not Obama that I am criticizing in this post--and I will give you that I am not clear. Obama has ALWAYS been an advocate of military interventionism and an increased defense budget.

If, however, you go back through both the DE blogosphere and places like the Kos you will find legions of Obama supporters who argued that he would be able to fund many of his programs with an Iraq dividend, and many of them ridiculed my assertion that there would be no such thing as an Iraq dividend.

Probably I should have gone back and spent the two hours necessary to link to all those comments, but I didn't--and the folks I am addressing know exactly who they are.

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...