Skip to main content

Confronting your own arguments..

As most regular readers know, I do a great deal of traveling to work as a consultant with history teachers nationwide. I spent this weekend in Washington DC, playing tour guide. I'll admit that sometimes that these are long days, especially when I'm hearing somebody spout their patter for the fourth or fifth time.

But this weekend was different.

I had never been to the International Spy Museum before, and--frankly--it was the single most impressive facility I have visited since the Holocaust Museum opened. The exhibits are not only first-rate, but the museum is a for-profit facility that is not sitting there sucking up my tax money.

We got the special tour, from the museum's historian, Dr. Thomas Boghert, and an hour-long session with former senior CIA operative Melissa Mahle.


Aside from her engaging presention, what was refreshing about Ms. Mahle was her lack of equivocation. She was honest about how badly the CIA blew any number of issues around 9/11, and on torture she said, "It's simply wrong. Unethical and wrong."

That evening we had a talk from as far to the other side of the political spectrum as you could get, with Dr. Allida Black of George Washington University's Eleanor Roosevelt Project.



In political terms I am pretty far distant from Dr. Black, but she is (a) the foremost Eleanor Roosevelt scholar on the planet; (b) an incredibly good speaker; and (c) one of the most intellectually impressive human beings I have run across. When you encounter somebody like Dr. Black, there are two things you can do: ignore her and cocoon yourself in your own beliefs, refusing to accept the challenge she represents, or take the opportunity to examine the central core of what you think in response to her presentation.

I'll be doing the second. Dr. Black pointed out the primary rule that Eleanor Roosevelt learned about debate: do not go into an argument until you can make all of your opponents best arguments as strongly as he or she can, and have figured out how to refute them. So look for me to be trying to challenge a few personal core beliefs over the next month or two.

Comments

Unknown said…
What an interesting weekend for you, Steve!

Next time I get a chance, I intend to visit the International Spy Museum.

Good advice from Eleanor Roosevelt. Following that advice could shut me up completely for awhile, which is probably just what I need.

Anyway, I will be looking forward to your self-challenge of some of your core beliefs, when the time comes.

Perry Hood
Anonymous said…
A quick, personal spy story:

In November 2000, having contracted to have a home built in Lewes, we put our home on the market and sold it for a few thousand under our asking price within two weeks to a single woman who was going to have her elderly parents come to live with her. She told us that her dad had early stage Alzheimer's, and the second kitchen downstairs would be enable them to live privately downstairs. We settled around thanksgiving time, and moved out.

A few days later, our former next door neighbor in Vienna called us in Lewes to ask about the new owners, why they would be having installed multiple telephone lines. We had no idea.

To make a long story short, the FBI made an arrest about two months later when an attempt was made to make a drop for the Russians in a nearby park. It turned out that the FBI had purchased our house and used it as a surveillance location to observe the house directly across the street from us.

Final comment: Several months later, the FBI sold the house, making a profit of about $13K.

I should have held out for more!

Perry Hood

PS: Bob Hanson, notorious spy for the Russians now in prison for life, lived directly across the street from us in Vienna, VA!

And "that's the end of the story"!

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...

The disturbing decline of the Delaware blogosphere: a very unfortunate Around the Horn (even if it's not Friday)

I've noticed a change in my own blog-checking habits over the past several weeks, and I don't know if it's just me or the reality of the last month of a divisive political campaign. I automatically used to check out Delawareliberal first and several times a day, because it was where I could find edgy, thought-provoking, and (dare I say it) funny banter going on. These days visit several other spots first, and my visits to DL are both shorter and less engaged. Why? Because the combination of invading neo-con commenters with the stridency of some of the major contributors has led to such pleasant exchanges as a post dedicated to labeling another blogger racist by donviti, whose own sense of provocative humor is generally so far out there that he makes John Belushi doing Samurai bartender on the SNL look positively pro-Asian. Or I can find Delawaredem and jason periodically spewing the idea that anybody who is not a liberal or progressive Democrat is somehow a non-American,...