Skip to main content

If you have friends in North Carolina, contact them NOW and ask them not to turn the calendar back to 1835

The infamous anti-gay Amendment One is still on route to pass, reports Public Policy Polling.

Why?  How could that be?

Well, it seems that most people don't know that Amendment One would not only make same-sex marriage illegal, but would rule out gay civil unions as well.

Here are the numbers:

55% of NC voters report that they support either same-sex marriage or civil unions.  41% oppose.

Yet at the same time, 55% of NC voters report that they intend to vote YES on Amendment One, which would make both of those illegal, and only 41% oppose.

The problem is that only 40% of NC voters know that Amendment One would ban BOTH same-sex marriage and civil unions.


When you tell them that, the 55-41 split IN FAVOR of Amendment One turns into a 60-38 REJECTION of the proposal.

Voters who think Amendment One ONLY bans same-sex marriage (27%) are IN FAVOR of the proposal by 72-27.

Voters who admit that they don't really know WHAT Amendment One does (26%) are nonetheless IN FAVOR of the proposal by 64-28.

So, basically, in North Carolina, the 53% of the electorate who either DOESN'T KNOW what Amendment One does, or ISN'T RIGHT about what it does, are the margin by which the State Constituion may be changed to deprive American citizens of basic civil rights.

Ironically, if Amendment One passes, it would not be the first time that North Carolina had removed civil rights from its own citizens.  Up until the early 1830s, the Tarheel State was somewhat unique among Southern States in that--even though slavery was legal--"Free people of color" could vote, testify in court, hold property, etc. etc.

But then, as historian Lorraine V. Aragon notes,


In 1835 the State of North Carolina disenfranchised “free people of color” who then could no longer vote, bear arms, testify against whites in court, sit on juries, attend statefunded schools, or select their own ministers.

This is where North Carolina appears to be headed right now.

So if you know folks in the State, contact them RIGHT NOW and give them the right information about Amendment One, because friends don't let friends deny other people's civil rights.

If all else fails, send them this chart:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...