Skip to main content

Penn Jillette Righteousness (and Delaware Libertarian's 3000th Post!)

This is a must watch dose of hard truth from Penn Jillette about our self-admitted formerly cannabis-smoking, "blow"-snorting President who chuckles away merrily about his violent, destructive war on people, over some arbitrarily government-unblessed substances.

Had "Black Jesus", as David Axelrod privately calls Obama, been on the receiving end of his own treatment, as are millions of otherwise peaceful, peaceable Americans - 100's of 1000's of whom are rotting in prisons this minute everywhere in this country (if not being ground up and ground down somewhere within the narco-enforcement police-prosecution-prison industry), his career and his life would have been senselessly ruined for no reason other than to justify the self-serving cowardice and willful ignorance of soulless politicians...like he is now.

Oh yeah, sure, Obama's cool.  Like a warm bucket of piss.



JILLETTE: "What troubles me about this... I think it's beyond hypocrisy. I think it's something to do with class. A lot of people have accused Obama of class warfare, but in the wrong direction. I believe this is Obama chortling with Jimmy Fallon about lower class people. Do we believe, even for a second, that if Obama had been busted for marijuana -- under the laws that he condones -- would his life have been better? If Obama had been caught with the marijuana that he says he uses, and 'maybe a little blow'... if he had been busted under his laws, he would have done hard f*cking time. And if he had done time in prison, time in federal prison, time for his 'weed' and 'a little blow,' he would not be President of the United States of America. He would not have gone to his fancy-a** college, he would not have sold books that sold millions and millions of copies and made millions and millions of dollars, he would not have a beautiful, smart wife, he would not have a great job. He would have been in f*cking prison, and it's not a god damn joke. People who smoke marijuana must be set free. It is insane to lock people up."

h/t RealClearPolitics: The Drug War & Obama's Drug Use: What Troubles Me - Penn Jillette

Obama needs to go.

Vote Gary Johnson / Jim Gray 2012

Congratulations to Delaware Libertarian's godfather, Steve Newton, on reaching 3000 posts here (2900 something of which are his....800 just in the last week, I' believe! *HAH*)

What an honor to be associated with him.  Thanks Steve!

Comments

pandora said…
3,000! Wow! Congratulations!

And... Tyler's in the house!
Tyler Nixon said…
Thanks pandora! You're my favorite lady blogger in the whole world and the tops all around, period. It means a lot to hear from you, always.
pandora said…
Aw shucks! Thanks, Tyler.
Tyler Nixon said…
P.S. 3000 posts is probably nothing for you guys over at DELiberal. But it is incredible when you consider it was seriously the power-blogging of pretty much one guy over maybe 3 or 4 years actual blogging time. I couldn't possibly keep up with him, even just trying to ingest and absorb the prolific results of his massive brain power.
Weclome back, oh prodigal brother.

I'm killing the fatted conservative Republican for dinner right now.

I hope this is the restart of the original "fusion" between us.
Hube said…
GREAT to see Tyler back in the house! Hope you're doing well, bro!
tom said…
Welcome Back Tyler!

And in case anyone's actually counting, it was 2.5 years of actual blogging w/ a 1.5 year break in the middle.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...