Skip to main content

Fact-checking Gary Johnson's economic claims: six years to Greece for the USA?

Everybody else is talking more spending.  From Paul Krugman to Barack Obama the mantra is that there has to be more stimulus, more public sector spending to get us out of the doldrums.  Mitt Romney talks about cutting spending, but would increase defense spending dramatically, while taking Medicare off the table for discussion.

Only Libertarian presidential candidate Governor Gary Johnson has been saying that we need to bite the bullet NOW, return spending to what we take in, and deal with the necessary contraction NOW, or else, as he said on CBS:
Johnson said the U.S. is "not immune from the mathematics of continuing to borrow and print money," adding that "we're only six years away from being in Greece's same statistical situation."
So is this truth or hyperbole?

According to the Congressional Budget Office, in FY 2021 the public debt will reach 90% of the US GDP.  At around that point, borrowing becomes ever more expensive, both as confidence in our credit-worthiness decreases and competition from other economies to borrow the same money increases.

At that point, with even the slightest misstep or unanticipated disaster (war, Katrina, etc. etc.) we are at the tipping point to become Greece.

OK, that's nine years off, not six, so Governor Johnson is exaggerating, right?

Wrong.

Take a look at the optimistic assumptions that the CBO had to use to hold off the 90% threshold for so long:

  • GDP growth, fiscal 2015-2018 — 4.2%, 3.5%, 3.4%, and 3.3%. The best we’ve seen in the past eleven years is 3.5%, one time.
  • Real wage growth for workers covered by Social Security, fiscal 2014-2016 — 4.0%, 4.3%, and 3.9%. That’s after inflation.

Miss two, maybe three of these fairly rosey projections and--guess what?--we slide off the cliff a couple years earlier.

Looks like Gary Johnson is credible on this one, which neither Obama nor Romney wants to talk about at all.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici