Skip to main content

Life as a gay man at the Delaware State Fair (at least temporarily)

To some extent it was funny (OK it was downright f--king hilarious) when the guy threw up his hands and shouted, "Don't touch me, Satan!" after Libertarian Ronnie Fitzgerald asked him to sign the marriage equality petition at the Delaware State Fair on Thursday.

And it was . . . interesting to stand there all day in the T-shirt and listen to the comments or absorb the looks.  "I hope your people can find happiness."  "No sir, I don't have truck with your perversions." "I'm a Christian so I will pray for you."  "You said you had a son, so you must have been normal sometime in your life."

I made a conscious decision that I wasn't going to say, "No, I'm not gay, I just happen to support equality for everybody in America," because I really wanted to find out at least a little something about what it felt like to be Chuck Mead-e or any other gay man standing up for his rights in what could at times be a hostile crowd.

Last night Chuck and Libertarian Wendy Jones had to be escorted to their vehicles at the end of the fair day by the State Police, thanks to some overly aggressive Delawareans who apparently don't like the First Amendment any more than they like gay people.  I didn't see that, though I did see several interactions on Thursday that had the potential to spiral out of control that way.

Chuck keeps his cell phone ready to dial 9-1-1.

I understand that.

This afternoon my sixteen-year-old daughter Alexis will be joining me at the petition table and doing a couple of hours of work soliciting signatures.  She asked if she could come, and I said yes before I knew about any of this.  Then my wife and I discussed it with her, and she still wants to go, even though she knows there is an element of risk involved.  She's a soccer goalkeeper and a basketball point guard, she reminds me.  Those are contact sports and involve a lot of intimidation.

I don't think she understands that this involves hatred and fear as well.

But we're going to let her go.  She's old enough and she's earned her right to stand up for her beliefs (and, besides, Chuck and I will be there on either side of her).

(By the way, she'd like you to know that she's not necessarily a Libertarian just because her gene pool happens to be so contaminated.  She's picking her own political ideology when she gets around to it, thank you.  But she does know it will include equal marriage rights for everybody.)

So I will let you know what happens.  I'm proud of her, and concerned at the same time.  But I'm also--WE are also--unwilling to allow our daughter to grow up not ready to take a stand for what she believes in.

(For yesterday:  thanks to Libertarians Jim Christina and Amy Merlino for their time at the table.)

And my last questions:  where are all the damn Democrats who are supposed to be so concerned with civil rights?  Why, when it comes down to it, are only the Libertarians apparently willing to stand up publicly and be counted with our LGBT brothers and sisters?

Comments

Hank Foresman said…
Steve,

The Democrats are hiding afraid to offend any potential voter.

Great for you and Faith allowing Alexis to go with you. BTW if you ever need another body guard I am available.

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba...

A reply to Salon's R. J. Eskrow, and his 11 stupid questions about Libertarians

Posts here have been in short supply as I have been living life and trying to get a campaign off the ground. But "11 questions to see if Libertarians are hypocrites" by R. J. Eskrow, picked up at Salon , was just so freaking lame that I spent half an hour answering them. In the end (but I'll leave it to your judgment), it is not that Libertarians or Libertarian theory looks hypocritical, but that the best that can be said for Mr. Eskrow is that he doesn't have the faintest clue what he's talking about. That's ok, because even ill-informed attacks by people like this make an important point:  Libertarian ideas (as opposed to Conservative ideas, which are completely different) are making a comeback as the dynamic counterpoint to "politics as usual," and so every hack you can imagine must be dragged out to refute them. Ergo:  Mr. Eskrow's 11 questions, with answers: 1.       Are unions, political parties, elections, and ...