Skip to main content

Fifty shades of cheap: the unlikely link between porn and online education

According to a recent survey, approximately two-thirds (64%) of adults with internet access view porn sometime each year.

Two-thirds of those only visit free porn sites, and not quite a third prefer to view their porn on DVDs.

Less than only about 6% of the people who view porn do so through pay websites.

This is responsible, the porn industry says, for a drop in revenues from a peak $13-14 billion in 2006 to just $5 billion last year.

"You just can't compete with free," says one industry analyst.  [I always wondered which courses I should have taken in college to become a porn industry analyst.]

This is one of the unanticipated social (and economic) changes wrought by the internet in a perilously short time:  universal social media and broadband capacity unravels certain profitable bottlenecks of information.

The porn industry is effectively being crowd-sourced.

This is also about to happen to higher education.  Strike that:  this is already starting to happen to higher education.


With the average debt for completing a bachelor's degree hitting six figures, a radical approach to learning that values what you learn over where you learn it or what credential you receive is starting to rear its head not only in competition with brick-and-mortar institutions, but also in direct competition with the University of Phoenix paid online model.

Free universities are beginning to proliferate like free porn sites.

Yep, I went there:  compared online higher education with online pornography.

But the comparison is becoming more compelling by the day.  Smaller universities are discovering that--despite the hype--they cannot turn online learning into a major profit center, and have instead paid a great deal of money to create a technical infrastructure that merely allows their own students to avoid attending early morning classes.  For all but a few universities, online learning is an expensive dead end--they just don't know it yet.

Within thirty years (possibly much sooner), I would guess that as many as half (possibly many more) brick-and-mortar universities in this country will be out of business, and the way we measure competence in most fields will have so radically changed that a college degree or even a doctorate won't have anything close to the cachet it enjoys today.

While education is generally seen as pushing toward the future, educational institutions have always been conservative and oriented toward past traditions rather than future trends.  I have seen this time after time as I have worked on committees at institutions or among national organizations where the people in charge are simply incapable of even imagining massive change in their industry.

They are, in effect, producing the buggy whips to fight the last war.

[Eventually this will all trickle down to public education, but that's so much of a profit and authority center for the Powers That Be that it will be much more strenuously defended than universities.]

Think of a world wherein the SAT [Scholastic Aptitude Test] is replaced by employers using a new SAT [Scholastic Achievement Test] wherein you can challenge the actual requirements for a job rather than having to certify how you got the knowledge.  We are already half-way there:  to teach in almost any state it is not good enough to acquire a BA in Education--you have to pass the Praxis II.  For Nursing you have to pass National Boards.  How long until you can simply pay your money and take a comprehensive examination and receive your entree into the field of your choice, with or without a piece of sheepskin?

Good professors will thrive in this environment because students will seek them out whether they have institutional affiliations or not.

Ironically, it will take longer to transit to a much flatter hierarchy of higher education than it did to transit to a flatter hierarchy of porn only because there are fewer government research grants distorting the porn market than distorting the education market.

But eventually we will discover that the higher education bubble (followed by the public education bubble) is in fact as unsustainable as the defense budget or the notion of paying to watch Jenna Jameson take it up the ...

Comments

Anonymous said…
YYYYYAAAAAAAWWWWWWNNNNN ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Delaware Watch said…
I know people who have, on their own, studied the law (including computers ase law) and court procedures to such an extent that they could almost certainly pass the DE bar exam. Why shouldn't they get the opportunity. Many years ago when I lived in NY it was discovered that a local surgeon, who had practiced surgery for years, had fraudulently claimed he had attended medical school. By all accounts, he was an excellent surgeon. I frankly hope that higher education is reconceived in ways that are less expensive, more democratic, and more amenable to students' lives and schedules. The entire system is worth questioning.
Anonymous said…
Thanks for comparing online higher education with online pornography. As I agree with your article, I cannot wait for the day that the education system is flipped on it's head. The last of these liberty-limiting monetary bubbles will pop and humanity will move towards a resource based economy.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?