Skip to main content

And if you actually want the figures on public education spending nationwide. . . .


. . . here they are.

I'm not sure if releasing them on April Fools Day was an intentional ploy by the Department of Education or not.

At any rate, lovely page after page of wonkish stats.

For the deeply concerned, according to the Feds, the average per-pupil expenditure is $9,138 per year; Delaware spends $11,633 (8th highest in the nation).

In purely instructional costs, we're 7th, at $7,096 per pupil.

The neat thing about bureaucracy is that you can publish all these stats and have them be meaningless without knowing what you're getting in terms of student performance.

For that you have to visit the National Center for Education Statistics, which will compare our math, reading, science, and writing scores at 4th and 8th Grades against national averages on NAEP [National Assessment of Educational Progress] tests.

And that's about what we are . . . average.

4th Grade Math DE 240/US 237
8th Grade Math DE 281/US 278
4th Grade Reading DE 226/US 217
8th Grade Reading DE 266/US 260
4th Grade Science DE 152/US 149
8th Grade Science DE 152/US 147
4th Grade Writing DE 163/US 153
8th Grade Writing DE 159/US 152

The good news is that we're at least slightly above average in all eight areas.

The bad news is that we're spending about $2,500 more per student per year than the national average, just to tread water.

On the other hand, New York, which has the highest per-pupil expenditure in the whole damn country, actually scores slightly lower than Delaware in all categories.

This is not a simple question, given that Utah--with the lowest per-pupil spending--scores almost exactly the same as New York and Delaware.

Now think about the Delaware governor's race, at least on the Democratic side.

What's intriguing is that the differences between the educational policies proposed by Jack Markell and John Carney are differences of such small nuance that at the first education debate they often gave the same answers to the questions.

This is perfectly understandable: Both men are being coached by prominent members of the current Delaware public education bureaucracy.

So there is no reason their answers would be different.

They are proposing exactly what the same Delaware education leaders who brought you average performance on an above-average budget want to do.

Don't look for any truly innovative ideas out of either candidate: the people pulling the strings when they talk about education don't have any to put in their mouths.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Libertarian Martin Luther King Jr. Day post

In which we travel into interesting waters . . . (for a fairly long trip, so be prepared) Dr. King's 1968 book, Where do we go from here:  chaos or community? , is profound in that it criticizes anti-poverty programs for their piecemeal approach, as John Schlosberg of the Center for a Stateless Society  [C4SS] observes: King noted that the antipoverty programs of the time “proceeded from a premise that poverty is a consequence of multiple evils,” with separate programs each dedicated to individual issues such as education and housing. Though in his view “none of these remedies in itself is unsound,” they “all have a fatal disadvantage” of being “piecemeal,” with their implementation having “fluctuated at the whims of legislative bodies” or been “entangled in bureaucratic stalling.”   The result is that “fragmentary and spasmodic reforms have failed to reach down to the profoundest needs of the poor.” Such single-issue approaches also have “another common failing — ...
44 comments
Read more

Libertarian National Committee Deathwatch Part 1

As the LNC continues to lurch towards collapse, with the latest news of mass layoffs at HQ, I've decided to begin tracking those things leading the national party to irrelevance, even as state and local parties gain power. As news, rumors and rhetoric break out, I shall chronicle them in this ongoing series at Delaware Libertarian. Organizations approaching failure have a number of characteristics. One of the most striking is renunciation of their purpose and effort to reinvent themselves as a "me-too" provider of services in the marketplace. In this, the LNC has been on a collision course with destiny for a while now. Recently, for example, it hired Republican Party web site developer TerraEclipse to redesign the LNC web site . Terra created a web site very similar to those of the clients it brags most about -- far-right Republican conservatives like Tom McClintock and BJ Lawson. A quick look at the web site they built for the LNC is instructive. The tagline on the ...
22 comments
Read more

Soda tax debate reveals fundamental progressive assertions about your lack of individual rights and the "responsiblities" of the State

I thought it would be at least amusing to use the Delawareliberal comments as sub-headings regarding each category of what is wrong with the proposed tax on sodas and juice drinks. But there are so many different little strands of each comment that it would be impossible to pull them all out. So, instead, I'm going to let you read them in more or less the order they appeared, and note the assumptions. pandora: I’m perfectly okay with taxing sodas and juice drinks. Mainly because they’re total crap, and one of the main reasons our country’s children are overweight. They are also dirt cheap. Assumptions here: (1) Because "I" am perfectly okay with a new tax it should be imposed on everybody; (2) it is the government's responsibility to keep children from being obese; (3) the cheapness of the product to be taxed justifies charging people more for it. John Manifold: Soda fattens your kids [and you and your husband], shortens their lives, costs more than water [a...
31 comments
Read more