Skip to main content

The Sheep and the Horses: Reconstruction versus Reality

Indo-European is the source language from which dozens of modern languages--from Hindi to Croatian to French--have descended. Scholars have been working to break down common words and syntax to reconstruct it for decades.



There has even been an attempt to create a story in what some researchers believe is our best reconstruction of Indo-European.

This is the translation:

The Sheep and the Horses

[On a hill] a sheep that ha no wool saw horses--one pulling a heavy wagon, another one a great load, and another swiftly carrying a man. The sheep said to the horses, "It hurts me seeing a man driving horses."

The horses said to the sheep: "Listen, sheep! It hurts us seeing man, the master, making a warm garment for himself from the wool of a sheep when the sheep has no wool for itself."

On hearing this, the sheep fled into the plain.



This is the original (note that [w] stands for a super-scribed "w" that I cannot do on blogspot) as written by Winfred Lehrmann and Ladislav Zgusta in 1979:

Owis ekwosk[w]e

(G[w][e]rei) owis, k[w]esyo wihna ne est, ekwons espeket, oinom ghe g[w]rum woghom weghontm, oinomk[w]e megam bhorom, oinomk[w]e ghmenm oku bherontm.

Owis nu ekwobh(y)os ewewk[w]ont: Ker aghnutoi moie ekwons agontm nerm widntei.

Ekwos tu ewewk[w]ont: Kludhi, owei, ker aghnutoi nsmei widntbh(y)os: ner, potis, owiom r wihnam sebhi g[w]hermom westrom k[w]rneuti. Neghi owiom wihna esti.

Tod kekluwos owis agrom ebhuget.


J. P. Mallory, in his In Search of the Indo-Europeans, points out the philosophical dilemma in creating such stories:

The question as to what extent the reconstructions, or as some might prefer, linguistic triangulations, represent the "original" language has always been a source of debate. There have been those who would argue that the reconstructed forms are founded on reasonably substantiated linguistic observations and that a linguist, projected back into the past, could make him or herself understood among the earlier speakers of a language. Others prefer to view the reconstructions as merely convenient formulas that express the linguistic histories of the various languages in the briefest possible manner. Their realit is not a subject of concern or interest. [p. 16]


The point? Today there are two of them.

1) The minor point: some days I get tired of the propensity of the blogosphere merely to move around or comment on information without injecting something completely new.

2) The major point: go back to my post about Osama bin Laden earlier this week. Is the Osama we see and think about a reconstruction or a reality? Pretty obviously, he's a reconstruction, filtered through a variety of cultural and information lenses. If you actually got to squat in the cave and speak with him, odds are he would be significantly different than your expectations.

But policy and opinions are almost always based on reconstructions, which are then treated as realities.

The problem is, everybody reconstructs differently--especially people from different cultural and political backgrounds.

Do you believe that if I could travel back in time some 5,000 years that I could use The Sheep and the Horses to communicate with the inhabitants? If so, then you can be satisfied with what we say we think we know about bin Laden as an effective substitute for reality.

If not, you're going to have to dig a little deeper.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Steve, This is very true, it is not possible to defeat any enemy without knowing yourself and knowing them. Our perceptions of what makes an "enemy" are many times the enemy of actually pacifying them. You make that point very eloquently.

As an aside Mallory is an excellent scholar and I have followed his work for many years.

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba