Skip to main content

Six word political philosophies. Why not?

Smithmag is a story-telling website that is home to the well-known project Six-Word Memoirs.

This started with the apocryphal story that Ernest Hemingway was challenged in a bar (where else?) to write a short story in six words, to which he replied: "For sale. Baby shoes. Never worn."

Smithmag has opened this up to both celebrities and ordinary people, with often astounding results that you can read both on the site and in the new book.

My entry was "Twins, adoption, grandchild. Cats. Joyous chaos." Ok, Steve Colbert's "I really thought it was funny" is a lot better.

But, anyway, here's my thought: what about six-word political philosophies and candidate description?

Here's my first take on Libertarianism:

Government shouldn't pay mortgages, mandate helmets.


Not quite what I wanted; only a small part of the philosophy. Six words is tough.

Second try:

Live free or die. Still valid.


Still not satisfactory, but you get the idea. You could also use it to criticize a political philosophy, like Liberalism:

Cradle to grave Nanny suffocates me.


(To my progressive/liberal friends: not intended as a cheap shot; I just figured out that it is easier in six words to lampoon or criticize an idea in six words than to explain it.)

So in the interests of fair play, here's a critique of Libertarianism in six words:

No government. Gated communities. Children starve.


I was also thinking about political candidates.

Say, maybe, Barack Obama:

Change? Cheap talk or necessary medicine?


Perhaps McCain?

Straight talk's cheap when emulating Dubya.



So this is my challenge. I realize that this is not one of those blogs that generates hundreds of comments. but maybe I can get some of you to take a shot at:

Describing your own political ideology (or criticizing somebody else's).

Describing, criticizing, or even lampooning a current candidate or major political figure.

You get extra points if your description is so good that the six words will actually communicate the idea or person you're talking about. (I'm still working on that.)

Anybody game?

Comments

Anonymous said…
Steve I can describe my political philosophy succiently:

Liberty, Fraternity, Equality or Death.
Anonymous said…
Here's one for you:

"Leave me the fuck alone, please."

By the way, you'll be happy to know (maybe?) that reading your site has made me realize in many ways I may actually be more of a "libertarian" than a "liberal." Keep up the good work.
Anonymous said…
Oh, and here's my take on the political philosophy of Dave Anderson at FSP and those of his ilk.

"Gays can marry? Sky is falling."

"Equal protection only if we agree."
Bowly said…
I'll steal Roderick Long's Libertarianism In One Sentence: "Other people are not your property."

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba