Skip to main content

Here's a thought for Libertarians trying to select a Presidential candidate. . . .

. . . and that's to stop listening to people who call each other assholes, or worse.

I have been perusing, and occasionally participating in, a variety of threads at Third Party Watch that I'm not even going to bother to link with.

That's because, instead of actually discussing the issues, or even the candidates, most of the posts devolve into scatological name-calling and multi-paragraph self-justifications of "my prior credentials as a better Libertarian than you are."

What's truly disturbing about this is that it is occurring in The Party of Principle, in which the fundamental principle is supposed to non-aggression or the non-initiation of force, fraud, or coercion.

Now I am a firm supporter of free speech, even though I am fighting the urge to initiate force and send a few of these jerks to the gulag.

But exactly how does a Libertarian, who supposedly believes in personal responsibility and non-aggression actually rationalize (a) the idea that calling other people offensive names equates with winning an argument, or that (b) any of this would make anyone ever want to listen to a Libertarian candidate anyway?

After all, isn't it a Libertarian premise that a state with a minimal government (or even an anarcho-capitalist society with no government at all) would be a preferable place to live? That people and communities would be self-regulating without the intrusion of government?

And calling other members of your party assholes (and, trust me, much worse) proves this point, exactly how?

So here's my thought for Libertarians trying to select a President: Make some logical--even passionate--arguments for your candidate and your cause, but realize that the first (or at least the fifth) time you descend into name-calling you've not only lost me, but most of the other adults in the room.

(I am pleased to report that supporters of Dr George Phillies--and the candidate himself--have not to my knowledge been engaging in such idiocy. In fact, several people posting, some of whom are not supporting Phillies on the issues, have made positive comments about his ability to remain civil.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba