Skip to main content

Mortgage rates, Fed spending, and that unfortunate law of unintended consequences....

... or, how spending $1.2 Trillion didn't quite have the result that the government was looking for:

NEW YORK (June 6) - The Federal Reserve announced a $1.2 trillion plan three months ago designed to push down mortgage rates and breathe life into the housing market.

But this and other big government spending programs are turning out to have the opposite effect. Rates for mortgages and U.S. Treasury debt are now marching higher as nervous bond investors fret about a resurgence of inflation.

That's the Catch-22 threatening to make an awful housing market potentially worse and keep the economy stuck in a funk. Kick-starting the economy requires higher spending, but rising rates mean fewer Americans will be able to refinance their home loans. And some potential buyers will be shut out of the market by higher monthly payments they won't be able to afford.


Which kind of makes you wonder--where'd all the money go, anyway?

Since the Federal Reserve is still immune to audit, I guess we'll never know.

Comments

Miko said…
I don't know; these consequences were so obvious I have trouble believing that they were unintended.

Note that this will tend to hamper efforts by the lower classes to save up capital (while the rich will simultaneously protect existing capital through inflation-hedged investments and collect agio from the newly-printed money they borrow at pre-inflation rates and pay back at post-inflation rates) both through higher costs for housing and staples and through the depreciation of savings, all of which will make unemployment a much more dangerous prospect, in turn leading to lower wages, nominally through the market forces of supply-and-demand but in fact from the debasement of the currency by legislative fiat.

While terrible for the overall economy, this will prove quite profitable for a select group of large business interests; coincidentally, there is a large intersection between this group and those who worked with the Fed to draft the policy that had these "unintended" consequences.
Anonymous said…
Miko, interesting point!

It may be that the wealth distribution in this country has become so skewed toward an extremely wealthy handful, that no matter what the government does short of grabbing assets, nothing significant will change for the better for the common man. Grabbing assets? Perish the thought!

I am beginning to think that there is no way that elections really matter that much, because the wealthy powerful will twist successfully to control either partisan majority and any President.

Obama is getting to look more like Bush as the days tick by, in my view. Obama's one asset is that his rhetoric covers it up better in spite of his increased transparency. Yes, that does not make sense, meaning that I am confused by this man. And yes also, it is still to early to judge his effectiveness. Impatience may the operative word. I hope that's all it is!

Perry

Yes, disappointment and cynicism are emerging for me wrt Obama & Co.
Must I be more patient?

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?