Skip to main content

Delaware is currently a two-payer health insurance state--and why we'll stay that way

So here's the math:

The current population of Delaware is estimated to be 917,092.

Of that, 225,426 are already on Medicaid.  That's 25%.

There are also 157,289 Delaware citizens on Medicare.  That's 17%.

There are 15,348 children on CHIPs.

There are 11,500 personnel at Dover AFB who receive their healthcare via the Federal government.

VA pensions and disability claims patients account for another 11,500.

The Medicaid expansion is expected to add another 30,000 patients.

This totals 465,332 Delawareans receiving their health insurance via the Federal government--or 51% of our State population.

In other words, we are already apparently teetering at, or just past the tipping point for effectively having single-payer health care in Delaware.

Don't hold your breath.

Below the fold I'm going to explain to you why Delaware will not go across the tipping point.


Of the 415,710 citizens of Delaware remaining, who ostensibly receive their health insurance from private insurers, 397,000 (85%) get their insurance through Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield of Delaware.

Well, not quite.  The Feds estimate that before the ACA kicked in there were 92,000 uninsured individuals in Delaware.  If we assume that we can deduct the 30,000 new Medicaid cases and probably the 15,348 CHIPs cases from that total, we are left with about 45,000 uninsured in Delaware before Obamacare went into effect.

So that means that Highmark's share of the private insurance market was not a mere 85%, but that we have to take out those 45,000 people, leaving on 420,332 in the private insurance pool, and giving good ole Highmark a 94% share of the private insurance market.

For everybody else--Coventry/Aetna, everybody--that's only 23,300 customers.  In other words, officially, and by any anti-trust definition:  Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield of Delaware is a monopoly.

And it's going to get bigger:  the ACA puts only Highmark and Coventry in the mix for picking plans on the marketplace, and if you look at the array of plans and costs, Highmark clearly dominates (early going had them picking up around 90% of the applicants).  So given that DFS expects to pick up another 25,000 private insurance customers that way, and that the track record suggests that Highmark will get 90% of them, you can expect the total Highmark customer base in Delaware to approach 420,000 by the end of 2014.

So what we already have in Delaware is not a single-payer system, but a two-payer system:  the government and Highmark.

And that's why there won't be a single-payer system in Delaware.

Need I remind you that our State legislature (thanks to Commissioner of Insurance Companies Karen Weldin Stewart and Senator Patti Blevins [D-Highmark]) engineered a deal when Highmark bought the of BCBS of DE to exempt Highmark not just from former reserve requirements of $175 million, but also from the scrutiny of the Attorney General's office?

Nor need I remind you that all those brand, spanking new MedExpress clinics showing up (with help from Highmark driving locally owned Medical Aid Units out of business) are the result of Highmark investing over $52 million in MedExpress?

Let's face it, my progressive friends who believe you will get single-payer health insurance through the Delaware General Assembly and signed by Governor Markell:  Highmark is not going to give up the 46.5% of the Delaware population already chained to them without a fight.

And given the relative ease with which almost any special interest, from fly-by-night electric car makers to casinos, to insurance monopolies has been able to swagger up to the public trough and slop away while the politicians they've bought stand aside, they're probably going to win this fight.

You know how they'll do it?  The ONLY trick Highmark hasn't pulled yet is to associate itself with corporate education reform.  Once they do that, the Highmark insurance monopoly is assured forever.

Better not tell them.  What?  You're kidding.  Too late.  Second row, fifth from the bottom:

And one final note for the diehard progressives out there:  Highmark did not acquire this monopoly via the supposed "free market."  No company that provides such horrible service as Highmark does could possibly compete in a truly free market.

Nope.  Highmark got it's monopoly the old-fashioned way:  the company bought it from Delaware politicians.

Comments

Anonymous said…
2nd column second one down? WTF?

Not from surprise, but how does that body do that without a vote? Was there a vote?
Unknown said…
Took me time to read all the comments, but I really enjoyed the article. It proved to be Very helpful to me and I am sure to all the commenter’s here! It’s always nice when you can not only be informed, but also entertained!
HIPAA compliance

Popular posts from this blog

Comment Rescue (?) and child-related gun violence in Delaware

In my post about the idiotic over-reaction to a New Jersey 10-year-old posing with his new squirrel rifle , Dana Garrett left me this response: One waits, apparently in vain, for you to post the annual rates of children who either shoot themselves or someone else with a gun. But then you Libertarians are notoriously ambivalent to and silent about data and facts and would rather talk abstract principles and fear monger (like the government will confiscate your guns). It doesn't require any degree of subtlety to see why you are data and fact adverse. The facts indicate we have a crisis with gun violence and accidents in the USA, and Libertarians offer nothing credible to address it. Lives, even the lives of children, get sacrificed to the fetishism of liberty. That's intellectual cowardice. OK, Dana, let's talk facts. According to the Children's Defense Fund , which is itself only querying the CDCP data base, fewer than 10 children/teens were killed per year in Delaw

With apologies to Hube: dopey WNJ comments of the week

(Well, Hube, at least I'm pulling out Facebook comments and not poaching on your preserve in the Letters.) You will all remember the case this week of the photo of the young man posing with the .22LR squirrel rifle that his Dad got him for his birthday with resulted in Family Services and the local police attempting to search his house.  The story itself is a travesty since neither the father nor the boy had done anything remotely illegal (and check out the picture for how careful the son is being not to have his finger inside the trigger guard when the photo was taken). But the incident is chiefly important for revealing in the Comments Section--within Delaware--the fact that many backers of "common sense gun laws" really do have the elimination of 2nd Amendment rights and eventual outright confiscation of all privately held firearms as their objective: Let's run that by again: Elliot Jacobson says, This instance is not a case of a father bonding with h

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?