Skip to main content

Obamacare, Delaware Medicaid, and the dangers of oversimplifying complex stories

Whether you are a friend or foe of ACA/Obamacare, it is often difficult to keep score about what's happening because the news media (a) breaks up many of the stories into discrete chunks that do not let you "connect the dots"; (b) most coverage is ideologically rather than factually driven anyway; and (c) most people are only reading the stories that comport with what they already want to believe.

Nonetheless, with an attempt at basic integration, here goes.

First:  sign-up continue to be abysmal. Delaware originally predicted that 25,000-30,000 people would find private insurance in the marketplace, and that a similar number would receive coverage under expanded Medicaid.  As of today the numbers are far from projections:  1,145 people have actually gotten plans and paid a premium; 3,183 have signed up for plans but have not finished the process; and 5,732 have become new Medicaid clients.  Only 13% of those who have stepped forward have been younger people.  Not surprisingly, the State has gone mum on statistics about how many people lost their plans or which private insurers are benefitting.  I'll show you why in a second.

Second, on a national level, cancellations are running ahead of enrollments by about 3 million.  Pro-rated for DE this would suggest that about 10-15,000 Delaware citizens have lost their insurance and thus far have not been able to replace it.

Third:  almost all of those Delawareans who lost insurance would have lost Highmark of Delaware BCBS "junk" plans, which they will end up having to replace with Highmark of Delaware Bronze of Silver plans that have high premiums and high deductibles.  If the early stats and Highmark's current monopoly status in the private insurance market holds true, at least 1,000 of those 1,1,45 new policies issued came from Highmark.  Given Highmark's business practices I would almost say that the 25% of Delaware citizens currently on Medicaid should be happy they are not covered by Highmark, except that . . .

Fourth:  your ability to use your Medicaid (if you have it) is becoming increasingly circumscribed.  Thanks to the Highmark/MedExpress 1-2 punch there is pressure on so-called "Medical Aid Units" (urgent care clinics) in Delaware.  The locally owned units except those belonging to Christiana Care, are slowly but inexorably being forced out of the market, selling to larger chains.  The chains coming in (and, one expects, eventually MedExpress) have a general reluctance to take Medicaid.  Case in point:  Dr. Vince Schaller's Hockessin Walk-in, which took anybody and everybody pretty much regardless of their ability to pay, has been forced to sell out to the Premiere chain.  And three months after the transition, guess what?  Premier stopped taking Medicaid.  Look for other MAUs and then doctor's offices to follow.  The Medicaid reductions in payments are forcing medical units out of the Medicaid market.

Fifth:  the State is probably secretly happy that fewer than expected have qualified for expanded Medicaid, as the Feds changed the Fed/State ratio and the Markell administration is now losing another $1,000 per year on each new enrollee.  Probably doesn't sound like a lot until you multiply by 1,000 by 30,000, and then suddenly it's real money.  I'm starting to hear rumors that the Governor is rethinking his commitment to expanded Medicaid, although I don't know how he gets out of it at this point.

Conclusion?  This is a mess.  How do we fix it?  Ah, the $64 million question.

Comments

NCSDad said…
Ezra tries to keep it real: http://m.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/01/09/a-health-industry-expert-on-the-fundamental-problem-with-obamacare/
delacrat said…
"How do we fix it?"

National single-payer/Medicare-for-all

That's the approach every other industrialized country has taken to fix it.

Not completely true, Delacrat. Britain's NHS is significantly different than a Medicare for all model, and so are others.

But even if you assume that Medicare for all is the preferred model, here's the roadblock: not one of those countries in Europe or elsewhere had such a gigantic health insurance industry that had been given the opportunity by the Federal government to cut the 50 states up into 50 separate little monopolies. Look at the deal Highmark got to come into Delaware and ask yourself which Democrats are going to forego the campaign contributions to bell the cat.
delacrat said…
"...the campaign contributions...."

Now, THAT is the root of the problem.

Popular posts from this blog

The Obligatory Libertarian Tax Day Post

The most disturbing factoid that I learned on Tax Day was that the average American must now spend a full twenty-four hours filling out tax forms. That's three work days. Or, think of it this way: if you had to put in two hours per night after dinner to finish your taxes, that's two weeks (with Sundays off). I saw a talking head economics professor on some Philly TV channel pontificating about how Americans procrastinate. He was laughing. The IRS guy they interviewed actually said, "Tick, tick, tick." You have to wonder if Governor Ruth Ann Minner and her cohorts put in twenty-four hours pondering whether or not to give Kraft Foods $708,000 of our State taxes while demanding that school districts return $8-10 million each?

New Warfare: I started my posts with a discussion.....

.....on Unrestricted warfare . The US Air force Institute for National Security Studies have developed a reasonable systems approach to deter non-state violent actors who they label as NSVA's. It is an exceptionally important report if we want to deter violent extremism and other potential violent actors that could threaten this nation and its security. It is THE report our political officials should be listening to to shape policy so that we do not become excessive in using force against those who do not agree with policy and dispute it with reason and normal non-violent civil disobedience. This report, should be carefully read by everyone really concerned with protecting civil liberties while deterring violent terrorism and I recommend if you are a professional you send your recommendations via e-mail at the link above so that either 1.) additional safeguards to civil liberties are included, or 2.) additional viable strategies can be used. Finally, one can only hope that politici

More of This, Please

Or perhaps I should say, "Less of this one, please." Or how about just, "None of them. Ever again. Please....For the Love of God." Sunshine State Poll: Grayson In Trouble The latest Sunshine State/VSS poll shows controversial Democratic incumbent Alan Grayson trailing former state Senator Dan Webster by seven points, 43 percent to 36 percent. A majority of respondents -- 51 percent -- disapprove of the job that Grayson is doing. Independents have an unfavorable view of him as well, by a 36/47 margin. Grayson has ignored the conventional wisdom that a freshman should be a quiet member who carefully tends to the home fires. The latest controversy involves his " Taliban Dan " advertisement, where he explicitly compares his opponent to the Taliban, and shows a clip of Webster paraphrasing Ephesians 5:22 -- "wives, submit to your husbands." An unedited version of the clip shows that Webster was actually suggesting that husba